okay.
i am eating french mints and drinking coffee. you know, the ones with the green pastel coating and the chocolate center?
if you decide you want dinner, just hoot. or... something.
@jack your mother is being a tireless catholic today, using your name of course. and virgina wolfe.
we need to find you a nook that isn't macron's hag wife and your mother influencing france in your name, italy, ireland, or oxford. you don't speak portuguese - that is impractical. how do you feel about wales? no one pays attention to wales. badass country is you ask me -
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wales
just setting dissenters "free" does nothing without policy change which would protect them from bounty programs. advocating for policy change which reconditions social fundamentals regarding the justice systems and on the ground policing/courts is useful. "free the prisoners" is lame and suggests a limited scope or an ulterior motive, both of which stem from propagandized intel. nostr:note1t036ye8zucfcmvvspmrvv3llzyn2nvx44uul5v2nhepndd60p53qr7jw9q
you're feeding the dipshit brigade by using the q network to "share" intel. they have no idea what to do with any of it but they believe it is real real.
i am not really worried about it. ideological radicalism is normal. ideological radicalism which pervades mass psychosis is not. the widespread access is corrected.
besides: i have a new pet fox. did you know?
portuguese is mildly understandable if you understand italian and spanish. it's all relative to what you consider to be "fluent" i suppose. we could say one of the reasons why south america has been able to effectively evade most colonisers since their independence is rooted in the widespread use of Portuguese in major urban settings. few bother to learn it.
nice by line. they need to be able to turn on first. no car should seat 3 of anything. 2 seats and a trunk - the only place a 3rd body should be at all. there was an attempt.
not a thing. fucking zealots. it literally means nothing. incidentally: trump is locked out now with the corrections. zionism is not faith. performative zionism is more and more easily spotted.
important to understand the lore surrounding genesis and the reality are not aligned. they were not protectors. they were tomb raiders: trophy hunters. evil as fuck. i have been trying to explain the difference between templars and inquisitors. many of my contemporaries were led to believe the original builders were wolves like them. they were vampires. bait&switch.
satoshi was a vampire.
make more sense now?
"jack" was his soap opera character.
the group chat was a group of high level
trophy hunter masons. but he coded it. it wasn't for the cia. but he was cia. and kgb.
he had already had me killed by the cops (legit). so why not. i was raised by spies. fuck a cunt like him. i am a scorpio. i will do anything to a trophy hunter traitor like that. fucking trash.
salvo works a double agent kill team. he has no loyalty. he's the most obnoxious sort of hacker - he will do anything for money. if you hired him, he will turn on you too. he's not "russian". he's a skunkworks traitor.
everything is preserved. nothing is erased. i told you everything i did and all of what i did is archived too.
if you are struggling to run in someone else's name - that is because that is not allowed based on the original node description in the white paper. and that was the reason for the entanglements. uploads are direct per individual unless they follow the public node to node with signature on the front end.
backend uploads will not replace front end comms; they will upload to your own box not the other party. backend comms are permission only - node to node, not in the name of.
my aunt caused the fork accidentally because she disagreed with my pos uncle.
i realigned it when she died because i knew how.
natural order according to the original node protocol is restored - i did not change anything.
my aunt had the key because of trust.
.... you figure it out. as gramps would have said.
i just really feel like most Bitcoin junkies refuse to comprehend the white paper and/or have never read it. and those in positions of power who could explain it constructively refuse to do so. an nda is not an excuse to perpetuate a profit scheme.
http://satoshinakamoto.me/bitcoin.pdf
the current iteration of "save the bees" is a psyop.
real bees are in no more danger than they have been for 45 years.
there are no human intelligence networks remaining which are of any value; they are all fed by influence tracks.
"save the bees" is a zionist alignment call.
no.
it should be a straight upload into a private box. shared content should be node to node with physical text. email text call. interactive should be front not back.
the branching is the problem. individual nodes without interactive node activity (text email call) should not branch to other boxes. if it's interactive node play, the interaction should require reply to initiate and not be a door kick in and open mining. uploads should not be part of interactive nodes - front only. for safety and legal reasons making interactive node engagement should be front and visible. backend engagement is increasingly the source of legal blackout.
individual uploads on back, interactive permission-only interaction on the front. no uploads for interactive engagement. back end delivery and dispatch between nodes could be by permission but it needs to be through the front end; not none of it is entered into identity boxes upon delivery without direct acceptance. it would mitigate people without any social media or phone getting abuse erased or killed etc.
that's seems so simple is that not already a thing or someone tried it?
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by nobody | export