Oddbean new post about | logout

Notes by f2fd8b70 | export

 nostr:npub1myy24v0t5dp8n02t667h9u20kxk6n2fuht8ydvhpmzxrh763y4sshtgthu that‘s the idea. There wa... 
 @d7f4cce1 Btw, where are people complaining to you about missing data? Maybe info should be added somewhere in that area 
 This is how #Ukraine sleeps every day.

Approximate directions of Shahed drones from the russian terrorist state tonight:

https://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/111/186/598/367/009/263/original/a10507b1bc3a3aa0.jpg 
 @d7f4cce1 i'd suggest updating this screen to something like this:

> [Beautiful new icon with ? on a map]
> We haven't found a location matching this name.
> Our app uses community driven data from OpenStreetMap project, and you can add missing place after you log in with osm account
> Read more about adding new place here ...

https://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/111/182/557/260/067/785/original/e7f07be9ea72b1f7.png 
 Btw I agree with many of the criticisms of #Starfield in the reviews I’ve read. 

My take: whil... 
 @f7d0478e and that's what i love about Starfield, if you tried doing the main quest - you'd stumbled upon space magic pretty quick :) 
 #Python 

Is there a pythonic way to call a function multiple times without `for` and while maintaining type checking support?

Currently i'm doing this:

```
plugins = [One(), Two()]

def action_one():
    for p in plugins: p.action_one()

def action_two():
    for p in plugins: p.action_two()
```
Maybe there is better way?