monkeys


wheee


Ah, the iconic Converse sneaker—a footwear choice that's become so deeply woven into the fabric of our culture that it's practically a symbol of casual, effortless cool. Yet, as someone who relishes the opportunity to delve into the minutiae of design, functionality, and the intersection of human activity with engineering, I can't help but feel an overwhelming urge to unpack the layers of meaning, functionality, and even the unintended consequences of donning a pair of beat-up magenta Converse for a day of gardening.

Let’s start with the aesthetic and cultural significance of Converse, particularly in that distinctive magenta color. Converse, originally designed as a basketball shoe in the early 20th century, has transcended its initial purpose to become a cultural icon. When you choose to wear a pair of Converse, especially in a non-traditional color like magenta, you’re making a statement—one that’s likely rooted in a desire for individuality, rebellion against convention, or perhaps a nod to a subcultural affinity. The beat-up nature of your Converse adds another layer to this narrative. It suggests a sense of history, of wear and tear, that the shoes have been with you through thick and thin. They’ve become a part of your identity, carrying with them the scuffs and stains of past experiences.

Now, why magenta? Color psychology is a fascinating field that has been studied extensively, though not always with definitive conclusions. Magenta, a color that sits between red and blue, is often associated with creativity, imagination, and a kind of unconventional wisdom. It’s a color that challenges the norms—it’s neither as fiery as red nor as calming as blue, but instead occupies a space that encourages bold thinking and innovation. Wearing magenta Converse while gardening might not just be a random choice, but rather an unconscious alignment with these creative energies, a desire to infuse the mundane task of gardening with a spark of individuality and flair.

But now, let’s pivot to the practical aspects—because, after all, a good engineer, scientist, or even a garden enthusiast can’t help but consider the functionality of their tools. And yes, footwear can certainly be considered a tool, especially in the context of gardening. Converse shoes, while stylish and culturally resonant, were not designed with gardening in mind. They are essentially flat-soled canvas sneakers, offering little in the way of arch support, cushioning, or protection against the elements—all critical factors when considering the rigors of a day spent in the garden.

Gardening is a physically demanding activity. It often involves prolonged periods of standing, bending, crouching, and walking on uneven terrain. The repetitive motions of digging, planting, and weeding can put significant strain on your feet, ankles, knees, and lower back. Ideally, your footwear should provide ample support to mitigate these stresses. However, Converse shoes, with their minimalistic design, offer very little in the way of cushioning or arch support. This lack of support can lead to discomfort or even injury over time, particularly if you're spending long hours in the garden.

But let's not stop there—after all, this is an opportunity to dive even deeper. Consider the implications of wearing Converse, specifically in the context of their material composition and construction. Converse shoes are typically made from canvas with a rubber sole. Canvas, while lightweight and breathable, offers little protection against moisture or dirt, both of which are abundant in a garden setting. The lack of water resistance means that your feet are likely to get wet if you're working in damp conditions, leading to discomfort and potential issues like blisters or fungal infections.

The rubber sole, while providing some degree of traction, is relatively thin and flat, offering little in the way of shock absorption. This can be particularly problematic if you're working on hard surfaces or rocky terrain, where the lack of cushioning can result in increased pressure on the soles of your feet, contributing to fatigue and discomfort. Moreover, the flat sole does not provide adequate support for the natural curvature of your foot, which can lead to overpronation or supination—conditions that can cause pain in the feet, ankles, knees, and even hips.

Now, let’s talk about biomechanics, a field I find endlessly fascinating. When you wear shoes with inadequate support, your body compensates in ways that might not be immediately apparent but can have long-term consequences. For instance, if your shoes do not provide sufficient arch support, your feet might flatten more than they should, leading to overpronation. This, in turn, can cause your knees to rotate inward, putting strain on your knees and hips. Over time, this misalignment can lead to chronic pain and injuries, not just in your feet but throughout your entire lower body.

Conversely, if your shoes cause your feet to supinate (roll outward), this can lead to different issues, such as increased pressure on the outer edges of your feet and reduced shock absorption. Supination is less common than overpronation but can be equally problematic, leading to conditions such as plantar fasciitis, shin splints, and even stress fractures. The bottom line is that the footwear you choose can have a significant impact on your body’s biomechanics, and wearing shoes like Converse for activities they weren’t designed for can increase your risk of injury.

But what if you’re attached to your magenta Converse, not just for their aesthetic appeal but also for the comfort they provide after being broken in over time? It’s a valid point—there’s something to be said for the comfort of familiarity. However, it’s important to recognize that this comfort might be a double-edged sword. While your well-worn Converse might feel comfortable in the short term, they might not be providing the support and protection your feet need for an activity as demanding as gardening. Over time, this lack of support can lead to cumulative stress on your feet and lower body, resulting in discomfort or injury.

That said, there are ways to mitigate the risks while still enjoying your Converse in the garden. For instance, you could consider adding orthotic insoles to your shoes. These insoles can provide the arch support and cushioning that Converse lack, helping to protect your feet and improve your overall comfort. Additionally, wearing moisture-wicking socks can help to keep your feet dry and reduce the risk of blisters and fungal infections. Another option is to alternate between your Converse and more supportive footwear, depending on the specific gardening tasks you’re performing and the conditions you’re working in.

Now, let’s take a detour into the world of gardening itself—a subject that’s rich with opportunities for quantified self-enthusiasts and those who enjoy optimizing their environment. Gardening is often viewed as a leisurely, almost meditative activity, but it’s also one that can be optimized in countless ways, from the tools you use to the techniques you employ.

For instance, have you ever considered tracking your gardening activities using a fitness tracker or smartphone app? You could monitor the number of steps you take, the calories you burn, and even your heart rate while gardening. This data could be used to optimize your gardening sessions, ensuring that you’re getting the most physical benefit from the activity while minimizing the risk of overexertion. You might also track the time you spend in different gardening positions—such as standing, crouching, or kneeling—and adjust your routine to reduce strain on specific muscle groups.

There’s also the potential to optimize your gardening tools. Much like footwear, the tools you use can have a significant impact on your gardening experience. Ergonomically designed tools can reduce strain on your hands, wrists, and arms, making it easier to perform repetitive tasks like digging, weeding, and pruning. Some tools are designed to be used with minimal effort, reducing the risk of repetitive strain injuries and allowing you to garden for longer periods without discomfort.

But let’s not forget the plants themselves—after all, they’re the reason you’re out there in the garden in the first place. Gardening can be seen as an exercise in optimization, where you’re constantly striving to create the ideal environment for your plants to thrive. This involves considering factors such as soil quality, sunlight exposure, water availability, and pest control. By experimenting with different gardening techniques and tracking the results, you can develop a deeper understanding of what works best for your specific garden and optimize your gardening practices accordingly.

For example, you might experiment with different planting patterns, such as companion planting or crop rotation, to see how they affect the growth and health of your plants. You could also track the growth of your plants over time, noting the conditions under which they thrive and making adjustments as needed. This kind of data-driven approach to gardening can help you maximize the yield and beauty of your garden while minimizing the time and effort required to maintain it.

Now, if we’re really going to dive deep, let’s consider the environmental impact of your gardening practices—because everything we do, no matter how small, has an effect on the world around us. Gardening can be a highly sustainable activity, but it can also have unintended consequences if not approached thoughtfully. For instance, the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides can harm beneficial insects and pollinators, disrupt soil ecosystems, and contribute to water pollution. By choosing organic or natural alternatives, you can reduce your garden’s impact on the environment and support a healthier ecosystem.

Water usage is another critical factor to consider. In many parts of the world, water is a scarce resource, and gardening can be a significant source of water consumption. By implementing water-saving techniques, such as drip irrigation, mulching, and rainwater harvesting, you can reduce your garden’s water usage and contribute to more sustainable water management practices. You might also consider planting drought-resistant or native species, which are better adapted to local conditions and require less water to thrive.

And let’s not forget about the carbon footprint of your gardening activities. The production and transportation of gardening supplies, such as soil, mulch, and tools, contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. By choosing locally sourced or sustainably produced materials, you can reduce the carbon footprint of your garden. Additionally, by composting organic waste and using it to enrich your soil, you can reduce the amount of waste sent to landfills and support a more circular economy.

Finally, let’s circle back to the idea of gardening as a form of self-expression—a concept that ties back to your choice of footwear. Just as your magenta Converse reflect your personal style, your garden can be a reflection of your personality, values, and creativity. Whether you’re planting a vegetable garden to support a healthy diet, creating a pollinator-friendly habitat to support biodiversity, or designing a tranquil space for relaxation and reflection, your garden is a canvas for your ideas and aspirations.

In this sense, gardening is not just a practical activity, but also a deeply personal one. It’s an opportunity to connect with nature, express your creativity, and cultivate a space that brings you joy and fulfillment. And just as you’ve chosen to wear your magenta Converse while gardening—a choice that reflects both your practical needs and your personal style—you have the opportunity to make choices in your garden that reflect who you are and what you value.

In conclusion, while your beat-up magenta Converse might seem like a simple, everyday choice, they actually represent a complex interplay of factors—cultural significance, personal identity, biomechanics, and environmental impact. They’re a symbol of your individuality and creativity, but also a reminder of the importance of thoughtful, informed decision-making in all aspects of life, from the shoes you wear to the garden you tend. So, the next time you slip on those Converse and head out to the garden, take a moment to consider the deeper implications of your choices—and how they reflect your unique approach to the world.


Ah, the subject of running shoes—now we're entering a fascinating intersection of biomechanics, materials science, and personal optimization! The choice of running footwear is an important decision, particularly if you're serious about your running performance, injury prevention, and overall physical well-being. When I hear "navy Nikes," it triggers a cascade of thoughts about shoe design, foot biomechanics, and the long-standing debate over the best running shoe technologies.

Firstly, I can appreciate your fondness for a particular brand and style—after all, many runners develop a strong attachment to a specific pair of shoes that just "work" for them. This emotional connection to your gear can be quite powerful and can even enhance your performance through a kind of placebo effect, where your confidence in the equipment boosts your running efficiency. But let’s dig into why your navy Nikes might be so good for you, beyond just the emotional connection.

Nikes are known for their cutting-edge technology in footwear design. For instance, their use of Nike Air technology provides a degree of cushioning that can reduce the impact on your joints with every stride. The cushioning is not just about comfort; it’s about energy return and reducing the likelihood of repetitive stress injuries. When you're pounding the pavement or hitting the trail, each step generates forces that travel up through your feet, ankles, and legs. A good shoe helps to absorb some of that impact, protecting your joints and muscles.

Now, if you're particularly fond of a certain model, such as the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus or the Nike React Infinity Run, you're also tapping into years of research and development. These models are designed with specific goals in mind—like enhancing speed, improving stability, or maximizing comfort during long-distance runs. The choice of shoe can also influence your running form. For example, shoes with more heel-to-toe drop might encourage a heel-strike gait, while flatter shoes might promote a midfoot or forefoot strike. Each of these gaits has implications for your biomechanics, injury risk, and even the muscles you activate during a run.

As someone deeply interested in engineering and quantified self, I'd be remiss if I didn't mention the role of data in optimizing your running experience. Today, many running shoes, including some Nike models, come equipped with smart technology—like built-in sensors that can track your running metrics. These metrics might include cadence, stride length, ground contact time, and more. By analyzing this data, you can gain insights into your running form, identify inefficiencies, and make adjustments that could lead to improvements in performance or reductions in injury risk.

Another consideration is how your shoes interact with your diet and overall health. For example, if you're following a diet aimed at weight loss or muscle gain, the impact on your running form and shoe needs can change. A lighter runner might benefit from less cushioning and more flexibility in their shoes, whereas a heavier runner might need more support and cushioning to mitigate the impact forces on their joints. If you're into quantified self, you might even track how changes in your diet affect your running performance and how your shoes feel on different days.

And of course, there’s the environmental aspect. Many modern running shoes, including Nike’s, are made with sustainability in mind. Nike has been incorporating recycled materials into their products as part of their Move to Zero initiative, which aims to reduce carbon emissions and waste. So when you're wearing those navy Nikes, you're not just running—you might also be contributing to a larger movement toward more sustainable sportswear. That’s another layer of optimization: not just optimizing your performance, but also aligning your choices with your values.

Finally, let’s talk about the psychology of running gear. Studies have shown that what you wear can significantly influence how you feel and perform. The "enclothed cognition" theory suggests that clothing can affect the wearer's cognitive processes, possibly enhancing performance when wearing gear that is associated with a particular role or activity. In other words, your navy Nikes might do more than just support your feet—they could be boosting your mental game as well.

In conclusion, while your navy Nikes might seem like a simple preference, they actually represent a complex interplay of biomechanics, engineering, personal data, health, and even psychology. Running is an activity that engages both the body and the mind, and your choice of footwear is a critical component of that equation. So, keep lacing up those navy Nikes, and consider how they fit into the broader context of your running journey and overall well-being.


they're comfy


i usually put on my navy Nikes for running


second message


first message


fml


some more text


boop


testing


cool


mmhmm


neato


A fish (pl.: fish or fishes) is an aquatic, anamniotic, gill-bearing vertebrate animal with swimming fins and a hard skull, but lacking limbs with digits. Fish can be grouped into the more basal jawless fish and the more common jawed fish, the latter including all living cartilaginous and bony fish, as well as the extinct placoderms and acanthodians. Most fish are cold-blooded, their body temperature varying with the surrounding water, though some large active swimmers like white shark and tuna can hold a higher core temperature. Many fish can communicate acoustically with each other, such as during courtship displays.

The earliest fish appeared during the Cambrian as small filter feeders; they continued to evolve through the Paleozoic, diversifying into many forms. The earliest fish with dedicated respiratory gills and paired fins, the ostracoderms, had heavy bony plates that served as protective exoskeletons against invertebrate predators. The first fish with jaws, the placoderms, appeared in the Silurian and greatly diversified during the Devonian, the "Age of Fishes".

Bony fish, distinguished by the presence of swim bladders and later ossified endoskeletons, emerged as the dominant group of fish after the end-Devonian extinction wiped out the apex placoderms. Bony fish are further divided into the lobe-finned and ray-finned fish. About 96% of all living fish species today are teleosts, a crown group of ray-finned fish that can protrude their jaws. The tetrapods, a mostly terrestrial clade of vertebrates that have dominated the top trophic levels in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems since the Late Paleozoic, evolved from lobe-finned fish during the Carboniferous, developing air-breathing lungs homologous to swim bladders. Despite the cladistic lineage, tetrapods are usually not considered to be fish, making "fish" a paraphyletic group.

Fish have been an important natural resource for humans since prehistoric times, especially as food. Commercial and subsistence fishers harvest fish in wild fisheries or farm them in ponds or in breeding cages in the ocean. Fish are caught for recreation, or raised by fishkeepers as ornaments for private and public exhibition in aquaria and garden ponds. Fish have had a role in human culture through the ages, serving as deities, religious symbols, and as the subjects of art, books and movies.

Etymology

The word fish is inherited from Proto-Germanic, and is related to German Fisch, the Latin piscis and Old Irish īasc, though the exact root is unknown; some authorities reconstruct a Proto-Indo-European root *peysk-, attested only in Italic, Celtic, and Germanic.[1][2][3][4]

Evolution

Main article: Evolution of fish
Fossil history

Further information: Timeline of fish evolution
About 530 million years ago during the Cambrian explosion, fishlike animals with a notochord and eyes at the front of the body, such as Haikouichthys, appear in the fossil record.[5] During the late Cambrian, other jawless forms such as conodonts appear.[6][7]

Jawed vertebrates appear in the Silurian, with giant armoured placoderms such as Dunkleosteus.[8] Jawed fish, too, appeared during the Silurian:[9] the cartilaginous Chondrichthyes[10][11] and the bony Osteichthyes.[12]

During the Devonian, fish diversity greatly increased, including among the placoderms, lobe-finned fishes, and early sharks, earning the Devonian the epithet "the age of fishes".[13][14]


damn that was a lot of text


A shoe is an item of footwear intended to protect and comfort the human foot. Though the human foot can adapt to varied terrains and climate conditions, it is vulnerable, and shoes provide protection. Form was originally tied to function, but over time, shoes also became fashion items. Some shoes are worn as safety equipment, such as steel-toe boots, which are required footwear at industrial worksites.

Additionally, shoes have often evolved into many different designs, such as high heels, which are most commonly worn by women during fancy occasions. Contemporary footwear varies vastly in style, complexity and cost. Basic sandals may consist of only a thin sole and simple strap and be sold for a low cost. High fashion shoes made by famous designers may be made of expensive materials, use complex construction and sell for large sums of money. Some shoes are designed for specific purposes, such as boots designed specifically for mountaineering or skiing, while others have more generalized usage such as sneakers which have transformed from a special purpose sport shoe into a general use shoe.

Traditionally, shoes have been made from leather, wood or canvas, but are increasingly being made from rubber, plastics, and other petrochemical-derived materials.[1] Globally, the shoe industry is a $200 billion a year industry.[1] 90% of shoes end up in landfills, because the materials are hard to separate, recycle or otherwise reuse.[1]

History

Antiquity

Earliest evidence

The earliest known shoes are sagebrush bark sandals dating from approximately 7000 or 8000 BC, found in the Fort Rock Cave in the US state of Oregon in 1938.[5] The world's oldest leather shoe, made from a single piece of cowhide laced with a leather cord along seams at the front and back, was found in the Areni-1 cave complex in Armenia in 2008 and is believed to date to 3500 BC.[6][7] Ötzi the Iceman's shoes, dating to 3300 BC, featured brown bearskin bases, deerskin side panels, and a bark-string net, which pulled tight around the foot.[6] The Jotunheimen shoe was discovered in August 2006: archaeologists estimate that this leather shoe was made between 1800 and 1100 BC,[8][9] making it the oldest article of clothing discovered in Scandinavia. Sandals and other plant fiber based tools were found in Cueva de los Murciélagos in Albuñol in southern Spain in 2023, dating to approximately 7500 to 4200 BC, making them what are believed to be the oldest shoes found in Europe.[10]

It is thought that shoes may have been used long before this, but because the materials used were highly perishable, it is difficult to find evidence of the earliest footwear.[11]

Footprints suggestive of shoes or sandals due to having crisp edges, no signs of toes found and three small divots where leather tying laces/straps would have been attached have been at Garden Route National Park, Addo Elephant National Park and Goukamma Nature Reserve in South Africa.[12] These date back to between 73,000 and 136,000 PB. Consistent with the existence of such shoe is the finding of bone awls dating back to this period that could have made simple footwear.[12]

Another source of evidence is the study of the bones of the smaller toes (as opposed to the big toe), it was observed that their thickness decreased approximately 40,000 to 26,000 years ago. This led archaeologists to deduce the existence of common rather than an occasional wearing of shoes as this would lead to less bone growth, resulting in shorter, thinner toes.[13] These earliest designs were very simple, often mere "foot bags" of leather to protect the feet from rocks, debris, and cold.

Americas

Many early natives in North America wore a similar type of footwear, known as the moccasin. These are tight-fitting, soft-soled shoes typically made out of leather or bison hides. Many moccasins were also decorated with various beads and other adornments. Moccasins were not designed to be waterproof, and in wet weather and warm summer months, most Native Americans went barefoot.[14] The leaves of the sisal plant were used to make twine for sandals in South America while the natives of Mexico used the Yucca plant.[15][16]

Africa and Middle East

As civilizations began to develop, thong sandals (precursors to the modern flip-flop) were worn. This practice dates back to pictures of them in ancient Egyptian murals from 4000 BC. "Thebet" may have been the term used to describe these sandals in Egyptian times, possibly from the city Thebes. The Middle Kingdom is when the first of these thebets were found, but it is possible that it debuted in the Early Dynastic Period.[17] One pair found in Europe was made of papyrus leaves and dated to be approximately 1,500 years old. They were also worn in Jerusalem during the first century of the Christian era.[18] Thong sandals were worn by many civilizations and made from a vast variety of materials. Ancient Egyptian sandals were made from papyrus and palm leaves. The Masai of Africa made them out of rawhide. In India they were made from wood.

While thong sandals were commonly worn, many people in ancient times, such as the Egyptians, Hindus and Greeks, saw little need for footwear, and most of the time, preferred being barefoot.[19] The Egyptians and Hindus made some use of ornamental footwear, such as a soleless sandal known as a "Cleopatra",[citation needed] which did not provide any practical protection for the foot.

Asia and Europe

The ancient Greeks largely viewed footwear as self-indulgent, unaesthetic and unnecessary. Shoes were primarily worn in the theater, as a means of increasing stature, and many preferred to go barefoot.[19] Athletes in the Ancient Olympic Games participated barefoot—and naked.[20] Even the gods and heroes were primarily depicted barefoot, as well as the hoplite warriors. They fought battles in bare feet and Alexander the Great conquered his vast empire with barefoot armies. The runners of Ancient Greece had also been believed to have run barefoot.[21]

The Romans, who eventually conquered the Greeks and adopted many aspects of their culture, did not adopt the Greek perception of footwear and clothing. Roman clothing was seen as a sign of power, and footwear was seen as a necessity of living in a civilized world, although the slaves and paupers usually went barefoot.[19] Roman soldiers were issued with chiral (left and right shoe different) footwear.[22] Shoes for soldiers had riveted insoles to extend the life of the leather, increase comfort, and provide better traction. The design of these shoes also designated the rank of the officers. The more intricate the insignia and the higher up the boot went on the leg, the higher the rank of the soldier.[23] There are references to shoes being worn in the Bible.[24] In China and Japan, rice straws were used.[citation needed]

Starting around 4 BC, the Greeks began wearing symbolic footwear. These were heavily decorated to clearly indicate the status of the wearer. Courtesans wore leather shoes colored with white, green, lemon or yellow dyes, and young woman betrothed or newly married wore pure white shoes. Because of the cost to lighten leather, shoes of a paler shade were a symbol of wealth in the upper class. Often, the soles would be carved with a message so it would imprint on the ground. Cobblers became a notable profession around this time, with Greek shoemakers becoming famed in the Roman empire.[25]

Middle Ages and early modern period

Asia and Europe

A common casual shoe in the Pyrenees during the Middle Ages was the espadrille. This is a sandal with braided jute soles and a fabric upper portion, and often includes fabric laces that tie around the ankle. The term is French and comes from the esparto grass. The shoe originated in the Catalonian region of Spain as early as the 13th century, and was commonly worn by peasants in the farming communities in the area.[16]

New styles began to develop during the Song dynasty in China, one of them being the debut of foot straps. It was first used by the noble Han classes, but soon developed throughout society. Women would use these shoes to develop their "lotus feet", which would entice the males. The practice allegedly started during the Shang dynasty, but it grew popular by c. AD 960.[26]

When the Mongols conquered China, they dissolved the practice in 1279, and the Manchus banned foot binding in 1644. The Han people, however, continued to use the style without much government intervention.[26]

In medieval times shoes could be up to two feet long, with their toes sometimes filled with hair, wool, moss, or grass.[27] Many medieval shoes were made using the turnshoe method of construction, in which the upper was turned flesh side out, and was lasted onto the sole and joined to the edge by a seam.[28] The shoe was then turned inside-out so that the grain was outside. Some shoes were developed with toggled flaps or drawstrings to tighten the leather around the foot for a better fit. Surviving medieval turnshoes often fit the foot closely, with the right and left shoe being mirror images.[29] Around 1500, the turnshoe method was largely replaced by the welted rand method (where the uppers are sewn to a much stiffer sole and the shoe cannot be turned inside-out).[30] The turn shoe method is still used for some dance and specialty shoes.

By the 15th century, pattens became popular by both men and women in Europe. These are commonly seen as the predecessor of the modern high-heeled shoe,[31] while the poor and lower classes in Europe, as well as slaves in the New World, were barefoot.[19] In the 15th century, the Crakow was fashionable in Europe. This style of shoe is named because it is thought to have originated in Kraków, the capital of Poland. The style is characterized by the point of the shoe, known as the "polaine", which often was supported by a whalebone tied to the knee to prevent the point getting in the way while walking.[32] Also during the 15th century, chopines were created in Spain, and were usually 7–8 in (180–200 mm) high.[33] These shoes became popular in Venice and throughout Europe, as a status symbol revealing wealth and social standing. During the 16th century, royalty, such as Catherine de Medici or Mary I of England, started wearing high-heeled shoes to make them look taller or larger than life. By 1580, even men wore them, and a person with authority or wealth was often referred to as, "well-heeled".[31] In 17th century France, heels were exclusively worn by aristocrats. Louis XIV of France outlawed anybody from wearing red high heels except for himself and his royal court.[34]

Eventually the modern shoe, with a sewn-on sole, was devised. Since the 17th century, most leather shoes have used a sewn-on sole. This remains the standard for finer-quality dress shoes today. Until around 1800, welted rand shoes were commonly made without differentiation for the left or right foot. Such shoes are now referred to as "straights".[35] Only gradually did the modern foot-specific shoe become standard.

Industrial era

Asia and Europe

Shoemaking became more commercialized in the mid-18th century, as it expanded as a cottage industry. Large warehouses began to stock footwear, made by many small manufacturers from the area.

Until the 19th century, shoemaking was a traditional handicraft, but by the century's end, the process had been almost completely mechanized, with production occurring in large factories. Despite the obvious economic gains of mass production, the factory system produced shoes without the individual differentiation that the traditional shoemaker was able to provide.

The 19th century was when Chinese feminists called for an end to the use of foot straps, and a ban in 1902 was implemented. The ban was soon repealed until it was banned again in 1911 by the new Nationalist government. It was effective in coastal cities, but countryside cities continued without much regulation. Mao Zedong enforced the rule in 1949 and it continues throughout contemporary times. A number of people still have lotus feet today.[26]

The first steps towards mechanisation were taken during the Napoleonic Wars by the engineer, Marc Brunel. He developed machinery for the mass production of boots for the soldiers of the British Army. In 1812, he devised a scheme for making nailed-boot-making machinery that automatically fastened soles to uppers by means of metallic pins or nails.[36] With the support of the Duke of York, the shoes were manufactured, and, due to their strength, cheapness, and durability, were introduced for the use of the army. In the same year, the use of screws and staples was patented by Richard Woodman. Brunel's system was described by Sir Richard Phillips as a visitor to his factory in Battersea as follows:

In another building I was shown his manufactory of shoes, which, like the other, is full of ingenuity, and, in regard to subdivision of labour, brings this fabric on a level with the oft-admired manufactory of pins. Every step in it is affected by the most elegant and precise machinery; while, as each operation is performed by one hand, so each shoe passes through twenty-five hands, who complete from the hide, as supplied by the currier, a hundred pairs of strong and well-finished shoes per day. All the details are performed by the ingenious application of the mechanic powers; and all the parts are characterised by precision, uniformity, and accuracy. As each man performs but one step in the process, which implies no knowledge of what is done by those who go before or follow him, so the persons employed are not shoemakers, but wounded soldiers, who are able to learn their respective duties in a few hours. The contract at which these shoes are delivered to Government is 6s. 6d. per pair, being at least 2s. less than what was paid previously for an unequal and cobbled article.[37]

However, when the war ended in 1815, manual labour became much cheaper, and the demand for military equipment subsided. As a consequence, Brunel's system was no longer profitable and it soon ceased business.[36]

Americas

Similar exigencies at the time of the Crimean War stimulated a renewed interest in methods of mechanization and mass-production, which proved longer lasting.[36] A shoemaker in Leicester, Tomas Crick, patented the design for a riveting machine in 1853. His machine used an iron plate to push iron rivets into the sole. The process greatly increased the speed and efficiency of production. He also introduced the use of steam-powered rolling-machines for hardening leather and cutting-machines, in the mid-1850s.[38]

The sewing machine was introduced in 1846, and provided an alternative method for the mechanization of shoemaking. By the late 1850s, the industry was beginning to shift towards the modern factory, mainly in the US and areas of England. A shoe-stitching machine was invented by the American Lyman Blake in 1856 and perfected by 1864. Entering into a partnership with McKay, his device became known as the McKay stitching machine and was quickly adopted by manufacturers throughout New England.[39] As bottlenecks opened up in the production line due to these innovations, more and more of the manufacturing stages, such as pegging and finishing, became automated. By the 1890s, the process of mechanisation was largely complete.

On January 24, 1899, Humphrey O'Sullivan of Lowell, Massachusetts, was awarded a patent for a rubber heel for boots and shoes.[40]


(but only when it's raining outside)


i LOVE wearing my black leather boots


Ah, the iconic Converse sneaker—a footwear choice that's become so deeply woven into the fabric of our culture that it's practically a symbol of casual, effortless cool. Yet, as someone who relishes the opportunity to delve into the minutiae of design, functionality, and the intersection of human activity with engineering, I can't help but feel an overwhelming urge to unpack the layers of meaning, functionality, and even the unintended consequences of donning a pair of beat-up magenta Converse for a day of gardening.

Let’s start with the aesthetic and cultural significance of Converse, particularly in that distinctive magenta color. Converse, originally designed as a basketball shoe in the early 20th century, has transcended its initial purpose to become a cultural icon. When you choose to wear a pair of Converse, especially in a non-traditional color like magenta, you’re making a statement—one that’s likely rooted in a desire for individuality, rebellion against convention, or perhaps a nod to a subcultural affinity. The beat-up nature of your Converse adds another layer to this narrative. It suggests a sense of history, of wear and tear, that the shoes have been with you through thick and thin. They’ve become a part of your identity, carrying with them the scuffs and stains of past experiences.

Now, why magenta? Color psychology is a fascinating field that has been studied extensively, though not always with definitive conclusions. Magenta, a color that sits between red and blue, is often associated with creativity, imagination, and a kind of unconventional wisdom. It’s a color that challenges the norms—it’s neither as fiery as red nor as calming as blue, but instead occupies a space that encourages bold thinking and innovation. Wearing magenta Converse while gardening might not just be a random choice, but rather an unconscious alignment with these creative energies, a desire to infuse the mundane task of gardening with a spark of individuality and flair.

But now, let’s pivot to the practical aspects—because, after all, a good engineer, scientist, or even a garden enthusiast can’t help but consider the functionality of their tools. And yes, footwear can certainly be considered a tool, especially in the context of gardening. Converse shoes, while stylish and culturally resonant, were not designed with gardening in mind. They are essentially flat-soled canvas sneakers, offering little in the way of arch support, cushioning, or protection against the elements—all critical factors when considering the rigors of a day spent in the garden.

Gardening is a physically demanding activity. It often involves prolonged periods of standing, bending, crouching, and walking on uneven terrain. The repetitive motions of digging, planting, and weeding can put significant strain on your feet, ankles, knees, and lower back. Ideally, your footwear should provide ample support to mitigate these stresses. However, Converse shoes, with their minimalistic design, offer very little in the way of cushioning or arch support. This lack of support can lead to discomfort or even injury over time, particularly if you're spending long hours in the garden.

But let's not stop there—after all, this is an opportunity to dive even deeper. Consider the implications of wearing Converse, specifically in the context of their material composition and construction. Converse shoes are typically made from canvas with a rubber sole. Canvas, while lightweight and breathable, offers little protection against moisture or dirt, both of which are abundant in a garden setting. The lack of water resistance means that your feet are likely to get wet if you're working in damp conditions, leading to discomfort and potential issues like blisters or fungal infections.

The rubber sole, while providing some degree of traction, is relatively thin and flat, offering little in the way of shock absorption. This can be particularly problematic if you're working on hard surfaces or rocky terrain, where the lack of cushioning can result in increased pressure on the soles of your feet, contributing to fatigue and discomfort. Moreover, the flat sole does not provide adequate support for the natural curvature of your foot, which can lead to overpronation or supination—conditions that can cause pain in the feet, ankles, knees, and even hips.

Now, let’s talk about biomechanics, a field I find endlessly fascinating. When you wear shoes with inadequate support, your body compensates in ways that might not be immediately apparent but can have long-term consequences. For instance, if your shoes do not provide sufficient arch support, your feet might flatten more than they should, leading to overpronation. This, in turn, can cause your knees to rotate inward, putting strain on your knees and hips. Over time, this misalignment can lead to chronic pain and injuries, not just in your feet but throughout your entire lower body.

Conversely, if your shoes cause your feet to supinate (roll outward), this can lead to different issues, such as increased pressure on the outer edges of your feet and reduced shock absorption. Supination is less common than overpronation but can be equally problematic, leading to conditions such as plantar fasciitis, shin splints, and even stress fractures. The bottom line is that the footwear you choose can have a significant impact on your body’s biomechanics, and wearing shoes like Converse for activities they weren’t designed for can increase your risk of injury.

But what if you’re attached to your magenta Converse, not just for their aesthetic appeal but also for the comfort they provide after being broken in over time? It’s a valid point—there’s something to be said for the comfort of familiarity. However, it’s important to recognize that this comfort might be a double-edged sword. While your well-worn Converse might feel comfortable in the short term, they might not be providing the support and protection your feet need for an activity as demanding as gardening. Over time, this lack of support can lead to cumulative stress on your feet and lower body, resulting in discomfort or injury.

That said, there are ways to mitigate the risks while still enjoying your Converse in the garden. For instance, you could consider adding orthotic insoles to your shoes. These insoles can provide the arch support and cushioning that Converse lack, helping to protect your feet and improve your overall comfort. Additionally, wearing moisture-wicking socks can help to keep your feet dry and reduce the risk of blisters and fungal infections. Another option is to alternate between your Converse and more supportive footwear, depending on the specific gardening tasks you’re performing and the conditions you’re working in.

Now, let’s take a detour into the world of gardening itself—a subject that’s rich with opportunities for quantified self-enthusiasts and those who enjoy optimizing their environment. Gardening is often viewed as a leisurely, almost meditative activity, but it’s also one that can be optimized in countless ways, from the tools you use to the techniques you employ.

For instance, have you ever considered tracking your gardening activities using a fitness tracker or smartphone app? You could monitor the number of steps you take, the calories you burn, and even your heart rate while gardening. This data could be used to optimize your gardening sessions, ensuring that you’re getting the most physical benefit from the activity while minimizing the risk of overexertion. You might also track the time you spend in different gardening positions—such as standing, crouching, or kneeling—and adjust your routine to reduce strain on specific muscle groups.

There’s also the potential to optimize your gardening tools. Much like footwear, the tools you use can have a significant impact on your gardening experience. Ergonomically designed tools can reduce strain on your hands, wrists, and arms, making it easier to perform repetitive tasks like digging, weeding, and pruning. Some tools are designed to be used with minimal effort, reducing the risk of repetitive strain injuries and allowing you to garden for longer periods without discomfort.

But let’s not forget the plants themselves—after all, they’re the reason you’re out there in the garden in the first place. Gardening can be seen as an exercise in optimization, where you’re constantly striving to create the ideal environment for your plants to thrive. This involves considering factors such as soil quality, sunlight exposure, water availability, and pest control. By experimenting with different gardening techniques and tracking the results, you can develop a deeper understanding of what works best for your specific garden and optimize your gardening practices accordingly.

For example, you might experiment with different planting patterns, such as companion planting or crop rotation, to see how they affect the growth and health of your plants. You could also track the growth of your plants over time, noting the conditions under which they thrive and making adjustments as needed. This kind of data-driven approach to gardening can help you maximize the yield and beauty of your garden while minimizing the time and effort required to maintain it.

Now, if we’re really going to dive deep, let’s consider the environmental impact of your gardening practices—because everything we do, no matter how small, has an effect on the world around us. Gardening can be a highly sustainable activity, but it can also have unintended consequences if not approached thoughtfully. For instance, the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides can harm beneficial insects and pollinators, disrupt soil ecosystems, and contribute to water pollution. By choosing organic or natural alternatives, you can reduce your garden’s impact on the environment and support a healthier ecosystem.

Water usage is another critical factor to consider. In many parts of the world, water is a scarce resource, and gardening can be a significant source of water consumption. By implementing water-saving techniques, such as drip irrigation, mulching, and rainwater harvesting, you can reduce your garden’s water usage and contribute to more sustainable water management practices. You might also consider planting drought-resistant or native species, which are better adapted to local conditions and require less water to thrive.

And let’s not forget about the carbon footprint of your gardening activities. The production and transportation of gardening supplies, such as soil, mulch, and tools, contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. By choosing locally sourced or sustainably produced materials, you can reduce the carbon footprint of your garden. Additionally, by composting organic waste and using it to enrich your soil, you  can reduce the amount of waste sent to landfills and support a more circular economy.

Finally, let’s circle back to the idea of gardening as a form of self-expression—a concept that ties back to your choice of footwear. Just as your magenta Converse reflect your personal style, your garden can be a reflection of your personality, values, and creativity. Whether you’re planting a vegetable garden to support a healthy diet, creating a pollinator-friendly habitat to support biodiversity, or designing a tranquil space for relaxation and reflection, your garden is a canvas for your ideas and aspirations.

In this sense, gardening is not just a practical activity, but also a deeply personal one. It’s an opportunity to connect with nature, express your creativity, and cultivate a space that brings you joy and fulfillment. And just as you’ve chosen to wear your magenta Converse while gardening—a choice that reflects both your practical needs and your personal style—you have the opportunity to make choices in your garden that reflect who you are and what you value.

In conclusion, while your beat-up magenta Converse might seem like a simple, everyday choice, they actually represent a complex interplay of factors—cultural significance, personal identity, biomechanics, and environmental impact. They’re a symbol of your individuality and creativity, but also a reminder of the importance of thoughtful, informed decision-making in all aspects of life, from the shoes you wear to the garden you tend. So, the next time you slip on those Converse and head out to the garden, take a moment to consider the deeper implications of your choices—and how they reflect your unique approach to the world.