I don't see it as creating a new system.

That's a typical engineer way of thinking. 

I just want more positive behavior and less centralization/more decentralization. 

What this means in terms of structures and institutions, I'm in noe place to plan or foresee.

And someone who say they are, IMO cannot be taken seriously.

I also look differently at Bitcoin than most people. 

To me, Bitcoin is a bridge to something new and better. 

We don't know what this "better" thing is going to be, apart from that to me it seems to give us more positive behavior and less centralization/more decentralization.

What Bitcoin rapidly is growing into at the monetary layer, we also need at the base layer - which are the ideas people subscribe to, and which makes up the people's belief system, broadly speaking. 

We need ideas that can bridge the gap from where we are to something better, with more positive behavior and less centralization/more decentralization. 

In the age of the enlightenment, some 2-300 years ago  positive ideas spread across the world like wildfire.

We had seen something akin to a religiois world war prior to this. 

But what the philosophers from France and Scotland did was to light the spark of the first world war of ideas.

Unfortunately  those ideas were soon drowned in the destructive thing we know as monetary monopoly. 

Armed with central banks that could corrupt the peoeple at a faster rate that anyone has ever seen, printing presses running hot made it possible for "the elite" to fight back and win the war.

Bitcoin evens things out, making it much more difficult for the political class to exploit their money-weapon.

And that's partly what makes me optimistic. 

I welcome the start of the second world war of ideas.