you have no idea if thats true or not because the network hasn't been stress tested at all yet. maxis have been saying the same shit for fucking years. the way it works is: build the tech implement the tech try and break the tech fix the tech (repeat ad infinitum) THEN maybe you have a real privacy solution. quit trying to claim victory at step 1 and 2, you look desperate.
Bitcoiners copium it's not easy to run a LN node to have self custody and requires to be online 24/7 it will never be an option against monero privacy. And if LN get real privacy and chainanalysis couldn't link IDs to transactions all exchanges would be required to ban it, just like they did with Monero.
The absurdity of claiming that L.N. is already a privacy solution when bolt12 offers only have optional blinded paths shows that they don't understand anonsets. The people promoting these tools are not the people that have real need for default privacy. They are simply religious fanatics and don't care about the facts.
Yawn, let me know when Bolt 12 and all these privacy solutions they claim have been tested for a decade, then I might consider it, except that I probably won't because I refuse to use custodial services of any kind. Most LN, ecash mints, etc all break the core of bitcoin by creating trusted third parties to fix their flawed systems.