Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
. | 4 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 Yes but this is what appears to be the extent of his wounds. It doesn't need to be extensive to be an important event.

https://image.nostr.build/59932b74ba486a7999211fda4f57b5a8a194ceae27046f9a5f6b30c69c5941a9.jpg
▲ ▼
MAHDOOD | 4 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Assuming it was an actual wound. These people are liars. Why should we trust them? https://image.nostr.build/50ae82803d0323aa3ff5a45bb56ad631c54780eacdb2c93b4f3dc5ab53c6c3de.jpg
▲ ▼
. | 4 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 So don't trust photo of wound but do trust photo of no wound..and also at the same time Trump and SS colluded to kill a bystander while he wwf'd his own ear?

Or how about he got slightly grazed and uses makeup a few weeks later because he is vain.
▲ ▼
MAHDOOD | 4 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Have you ever shot a gun before? A bullet grazing your ear would rip a chunk off.

Feds have killed innocent people before to get people scared and emotional. 

There are plenty of other pictures of his ear that I’ve shared with no wound. Also the vain argument is silly because you can easily argue the flip side: he is so vain that he would actually show off how bad the scar was. This would get more people to simp for him. But saying that it was just a scratch and that somehow trump is using cosmetics to cover it up is major cope.
▲ ▼
. | 4 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 I am here for the conspiracy fun. I have no cope. And yes I have shot plenty of guns. You keep wanting there to be some huge wound. Are you arguing he colluded with SS to kill bystanders?
▲ ▼
MAHDOOD | 4 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 No I’m not arguing that. We don’t even know for a fact that people actually died but that doesn’t prove or disprove anything. I don’t know who did all this or why. I just don’t believe the narrative they’re putting out there.
▲ ▼
Dan | 4 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 This "if he was grazed, he'd have a chunk missing" just isn't logical man... It depends on how much flesh was actually hit. It's entirely possible that the cut is very small and able to he covered up with make-up or just not large enough to see if a zoomed in picture. 

This conspiracy has zero credible proof beyond general distrust.