nostr:npub1qmnj95gmcgjw0ax3nnq3txa36mwe85fd50jffckp3flf6es7l26seuvk3l So if anything is missed in the introduction, readers can read the topic's functionality and get a better idea of how it will work, indirectly solving their question about what the topic is about. And this is basically tradition, and most readers prefer this format, yet there are diverse responses. If such feedback continues, I might consider altering the article structure in the future.