https://m.primal.net/INtA.jpg 

https://m.primal.net/INtB.jpg 

https://m.primal.net/INtE.jpg 

I checked mempool several times today and almost all of the time, I found mempool filled with garbage data (to scam the people).

If these blocks have been filled with garbage most of the time then why do we need 4MB blocks? 

Why are Bitcoiners talking about further upgrades? Instead it would be WISE to talk about  reducing the blocksize limit since the free market has been trying to tell us that we don't need 4MB blocks. It's being misused by attackers and spammers.

Reducing the blocksize will probably do following things: - 

1) Keep the cost of running nodes very low (hence it helps with decentralization) 
2) It promotes scalability in layers (i.e. L2, L3 etc) instead of on chain scaling. 

What are the real risks by reducing block size? Except some scammers can't scam the people easily (but I believe that's a good thing)

I think #bitcoin thrives more with conservatism than progressivism.

cc  nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk  nostr:npub1wnlu28xrq9gv77dkevck6ws4euej4v568rlvn66gf2c428tdrptqq3n3wr  nostr:npub1au23c73cpaq2whtazjf6cdrmvam6nkd4lg928nwmgl78374kn29sq9t53j