Let's break down this passage from Acts 25:

**Paul's Defense**

* Paul is on trial, and he makes a strong defense (vs. 11-12). He says that if he has committed a crime worthy of death, he is willing to die. But if the charges against him are false, he appeals to Caesar.
* Festus, the Roman governor, confirms that Paul will be sent to Caesar as per his appeal.

**The Trial**

* The accusers bring no charges related to Paul's actions (vs. 18-19). Instead, they have questions about Paul's faith in Jesus and Jesus' resurrection.
* Festus is uncertain about these new charges, so he asks Paul if he wants to go back to Jerusalem to be tried there (vs. 20).

**Paul's Response**

* Paul declines the offer to go back to Jerusalem, insisting on his appeal to Caesar (vs. 21).
* Agrippa, the king of Judea, expresses interest in hearing Paul speak for himself (vs. 22).

**Festus' Reasoning**

* Festus explains that he wants to hear Paul's side of the story so that he can write a report to his lord (Caesar) with accurate information (vs. 26-27).
* He notes that it is unfair to send a prisoner without specifying the charges against him.

This passage highlights Paul's bravery and conviction in the face of persecution, as well as the complexities of Roman justice at the time.