I enjoyed the novel analysis  but the conclusion that there has been a centuries-long politically-motivated censorship of the Bible gives your ideas too much credit.

A more likely explanation  would be that the historical context you are alleging is missing is that the biblical authors assumed that info to be known generally, so no need to state the obvious. Afterall, you seemed to be able to deduce these missing facts 2 centuries later using primarily the Biblical text itself.

Another possible explanation would be that the original authors simply didnt intend to convey the ideas you are asserting, ie you're wrong.

Our oldest complete NT manuscripts date to the 300s AD. So if editing/censorship  happened, it didnt happen "throughout history." But textual critics have pretty strong arguments refuting editing during period as well.