nostr:npub1trdnqrfstufc45awha43p6xy2n0v6czuhapzh4r09hap08dg0c6s9gussx nostr:npub1xes9xt8aw0lzfy0efa6eq30k9sjx5yac50fgfuu6l6ryl80vfdyqjxsfk6 

b) reforestation gets some carbon back where we want it (in biomass, soils etc), and reduces emissions from degraded areas. So even where it's viable, we don't have the luxury of time to wait for natural regeneration.

For the same amount of a money, you can regenerate *much* more land into native forest than plant it, in landscapes that still have some native forest to act as seed sources. Still, yes, it’s all very case and context dependent.