release notes: nostr:naddr1qq8k2m3dwfjkcetpwdjj6v3c9ccqzymhwden5te0dehhxarj9eurqe3wdaexwq3qga6szaamdwc3x7zwf9eldvhrm5n778hlyf7kuwxsq3kkrztfusdqxpqqqp65w4cu4ss torrent: nostr:nevent1qvzqqqq86vpzqz4rnedwlxdqqznmmv95ny2cey4uf23qldjexxjj6p2mt6mdlaecqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcqyp4wtmvquvq7zta4dq2qe9mr2890nhmt60386986y2czv85y76vpwwewzet
this is a complete release announcement and download without reference to either github or bitcoincore.org (the idea is to automatically generate this from the yaml descriptor https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/refs/heads/master/_releases/28.0.md ) still working on it; it would, for example, make sense to put a reference to the torrent event directly in the release notes
Maybe put the torrent in the same note as the release note?
in the same event? that wouldn't work, torrents are kind 2003, whereas markdown notes are 30023 however, markdown notes can reference other events through the normal link syntax and "nostr:" scheme, so adding a reference would be straightforward
Ah yes, in that case it makes sense to have the release notes link to the event. And if l the 🧲 URL is in the release notes that's a nice fallback.
i've experimented a bit with nostr: URLs in the markdown, but this embedding doesn't seem to be handled great in clients (nostrudel generates a unusable link back to itself, habla keeps the nostr: link assuming that the browser will handle it...) even though NIP-23 explicitly mentions this so yes, putting in the magnet URL directly makes more sense for now
I see that the magnet link includes tracker info, but the Nostr note does not. How does that work?