Who is responsible for zap.cooking?


(Reported for misogyny)

Um, I think nostr:nprofile1qqsfhsknfhw6s0v59g0a6d48fple4tk8grdjf6newvkepcur6xwjjjqpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhszymhwden5te0wp6hyurvv4cxzeewv4ej7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctch3mnpr  or may know?


Nunca imaginei um site de receitas culinária no Nostr.
nostr:nevent1qqsqqqypsypxq6mnuqa67uhhujv0fsq0ksvfqzjp4lpfyekmg45ckkgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsrhuxx8l9ex335q7he0f09aej04zpazpl0ne2cgukyawd24mayt8grqsqqqqqpu5ymlw


ask nostr:npub1n0pdxnwa4q7eg2slm5m2wjrln2hvwsxmyn48juedjr3c85va99yqc5pfp6 ? seen her talk about it on the tl


Me! Why?


Ficou sensacional kkk

nostr:nevent1qqsqqqypsypxq6mnuqa67uhhujv0fsq0ksvfqzjp4lpfyekmg45ckkgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsrhuxx8l9ex335q7he0f09aej04zpazpl0ne2cgukyawd24mayt8grqsqqqqqpu5ymlw


A bunch of bots 🤖


Bot 🤖 right!


Nice app!


Don't know who, but thanks to the person, and thanks to you for bringing it to my attention...


Lol


Onward 🫡


Am I in trouble? 😂

It’s a team effort. nostr:npub1q7klm2w94hyq3qdm9ffzpahrrq0qcppmjrapzhz0rq6xgq3fdrnqr6atmj developed the original concept, nostr:npub1chakany8dcz93clv4xgcudcvhnfhdyqutprq2yh72daydevv8zasmuhf02 has been working on additional development with design support from nostr:npub1r0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgs4sq9ac. nostr:npub1aeh2zw4elewy5682lxc6xnlqzjnxksq303gwu2npfaxd49vmde6qcq4nwx developed the logo and nostr:npub1n0pdxnwa4q7eg2slm5m2wjrln2hvwsxmyn48juedjr3c85va99yqc5pfp6 is working on content and marketing.


sounds like a recipe for success


This is why we can never lose our nostr:npub1t3ggcd843pnwcu6p4tcsesd02t5jx2aelpvusypu5hk0925nhauqjjl5g4.


I was just thinking that it would be good to define a standard for recipes on Nostr, probably with a different kind, with some relevant tags. The current way is kinda bad because it abuses the long-articles NIP and then includes some proprietary (and very long) "t" tags. Do you have any thoughts?

And then we need some other client to prove that the standard is good and then to show how can you display or interact with recipes differently.


What does this mean?
https://nostrcheck.me/media/fc3d952b4049676c4d3cfedb592e0041b3fbf522228713b13deb81328a7c53df/6e3c159fc262a19a82081aaf26c183f6617b83bd266ef69cc34854cb0e5e28f3.webp


Can’t stop laughing 🤣


I don’t know if it’s the same elsewhere but in the United States the first ingredient is what goes first. This may be obvious to those in US but different elsewhere. IDK 🤷🏻♀


This would help solve content discovery problem, assuming that clients would embrace, but would also take away from current client support. I get it though trying to keep long form clean and true to form. It’s something worth exploring, would love to hear additional feedback from other client developers 🤔


I would love to see a feature added to zap.cooking that’s as easy as how cooked.wiki works, where you can link a recipe from a normie site filled with ads and bullshit and it strips out everything but the essential details and adds a step-by-step checklist and a portion calculator.


Are there other clients? We don't have to trash the current recipes, we could do a transition by doing a [REQ, legacy, {kinds: [30023], #t: [cookingwhatever], until: 2024-09-04}] and then only fetch recipes on the new standard going forward. Does it work?


We’re so early! I don’t know if other clients exist even..


Unrelated, but I also think the current approach of just blasting recipes everywhere and then connecting to 50 relays and trying to download them isn't going to work in the long term since it can be spammed and will be infeasible when a lot of people come.

A mix of followers + WoT and outbox model, like-based recommendations and relay-based curation is the way to go in my view. That's kind of what I implemented on https://wikistr.com/ and I think it be improved and tweaked but applies to all these other-stuff use cases like recipes.

What do you think?


100% agree with this. I would love a standard kind for recipes. Instructions and ingredients could be in tags or something.


Why are you going to put a hit on them?


Side note, because I dont know what any of this means: Ideally I would like to have a Zap Cooking newsletter type long form post featuring new zap.cooking recipes, articles, and all that jazz that shoots out to all of nostr if they are following the zap cooking, and then people are allowed to share their recipes on their profile (key) as an option or share it to their business profiles (shared key with team members) or gets posted on long form apps like highlighter. Automattically posting on newsfeeds might not be for all people, some people might just want to create a collection for themselves. I would like to offer the choice for the users.


I came across https://cooklang.org a while back. Not sure if markup formats make sense within nostr, but maybe some lessons can be learned.


Could there be some sort of regular roundup with autogenerated content showing highlights of what’s been added or most popular recipes?


Can't wait for zap.chemistry


I agree.


Good lord... What an idea. Imagine releasing an AI assistant to it.


Yeah, DVM where you give it whats in your fridge and it finds a recipe within the new recipe kind.


The team discussed this and thought it would be so fun.


We should do this definitely.


nostr:npub1l3cgtsurhfchg4cyhhqudm70074sr96srhje330xc5m6czej5n9s9q6vs2 here's a NIP you should write.


Who is responsible for zap.cooking?


That's truely amazing haha