Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
fiatjaf | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 I like it.

nostr:nprofile1qyghwumn8ghj7vf5xqhxvdm69e5k7tcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qpql2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afq85ne77  nostr:nprofile1qythwumn8ghj7anfw3hhytnwdaehgu339e3k7mf0qythwumn8ghj76twvfhhstnwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0qy2hwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytn00p68ytnyv4mz7qpqgcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqjt2msn  nostr:nprofile1qyfhwumn8ghj7mmxve3ksctfdch8qatz9uqsuamnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshszxthwden5te0dphkgmrzdajzumn0wd68yvfwvdhk6tcqyztuwzjyxe4x2dwpgken87tna2rdlhpd02va5cvvgrrywpddnr3jyhdw0my  nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wghx6mmd9uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0qqs0l5m4adqwkjrx26sz3mduswp97k8lp4wy5xaz9lnhghfgg5576zqgghzjt  nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj77tpvf6jumt99uq3uamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9emkjun9v3hx2apwdfcz7qglwaehxw309ahx7um5wgkhyetvv9ujumn0ddhhgctjduhxxmmd9uqzqynpqwlamjxly44kuz4l6lehjlyqmnzw4z8hctu8m4qsggstf4jl6p64r3  nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wdejhgtcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7um5wghxyctwvshsqgqh88vn0hyvp3ehp238tpvn3sgeufwyrakygxjaxnrd8pgruvfkautfdgl3  nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj77tpvf6jumt99uq3kamnwvaz7tmwwfjkccte9e3j6um5v4kxcctj9ehx2ap0qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tcqyrgazar3zhgkw5df0s3e73hvzupjjtpm06vc3w0tm48vguzmzhk5gd07gxp  what do you think?
▲ ▼
Vitor Pamplona | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +2 
 Yep, we already use a similar thing for Amber, @greenart7c3
▲ ▼
398ja | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 I think Amber and nsecbunker do something like this already. I agree, it would be nice to formalise it in the spec.
▲ ▼
hodlbod | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Yeah, this sounds reasonable to me
▲ ▼
Dawlat_Moustafa | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 Isn’t it too complicated for normies to understand technical/dev terms without a clickable explanatory statement?!
▲ ▼
brugeman | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 We're discussing the protocol level, the UI on screenshot is just the first implementation of it, we will make it more meaningful and simple later.
▲ ▼
Dawlat_Moustafa | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 Excuse me for interfering in your technical discussion and allow me to annoy you with another question; Nostr provides some addresses such as NIP-05 (account verification address) or Alby’s addresses etc., wouldn’t it be useful to allow users to have email accounts using the obtained addresses?! (So that the email and the generated password can be connected somehow to any Nostr client without the nsec and used for third-party login?!
▲ ▼
brugeman | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Sorry, I didn't mean to discourage you from providing feedback.
Some nip05 services also provide email service using the same name, but not sure if that's relevant here. 
The nip05 and password can be used to sign in to (soon to be) any nostr client using nsec.app or other nip46 implementations. Try signing up on nsec.app (or import your relay keys there) and then you can use your name@nsec.app to sign in to nostr clients like Nostrudel, Snort, Habla etc.