this election is revealing all the statists


:thugamy:


I love this because 99% of people immediately thought "Jack must be talking about the other team"


Interesting to follow, I guess.


What is different this time?


As most elections do


:blobyes:


It's revealing that they are all statists


or lack thereof


Can you have an election without statists?


Yes indeed💯


I feel like every election does, to some degree.


Don’t you run a company that abides by all sorts of federal and state regulations?


So did covid


Onward 🫡


BTC pumping helps Trump.


- The man who deplatformed a president talking about statists 👀


Generational Wealth. You are Welcome 🫡


this election, the nostr algorithm client is revealing the best posts across nostr:

https://nostr.thecaptain.dev


think about that one a bit harder, anon, you’re almost there.


yes. your point?


Isn’t that in a way feeding into the will of the state?


Who will you be voting for if you don’t mind me asking?


The uniparty is the problem. We need to take back the country starting at the local level and repeal the 17th amendment.


difference between following the law and wanting more law over you


Lol. What a retarded comment.


Feel you from Germany. Regulations everywhere...


a government registered corporation is really an appendage of the state... ultimately they can rug you, but just because you own and run one and have a stake doesn't make YOU an appendage of the state, except as far as the business of this corporation

big money and registered companies put a bullseye on your back, but it's often required in order to do some things that require large amounts of money and coordination

i wouldn't do it, but i also know from experience with registering and operating a corporation (in bulgaria) that there is a substantial exit penalty also


I believe we will reach a day where people will realize that it was never about the State in itself but much more about mechanisms that control or define that state.

In other words I say this because there's seems to always be a need for a source of truth. We can call it anything but this need seems to be pretty much inevitable. Accounting (a source of truth) basically started civilization in Mesopotamia. We need a (several) source of truth. Bitcoin is clearly one very good source of truth, as we know.

The nation states were an original version of the source of truth. The real question in my view is HOW does that source of truth will look like in the future for different fields, including the nation state and politics.

I think Switzerland shows a good example for the current nation state model (because of their referendum models, etc) can look like. In other words I do think that in the next 50 years, new nation states models will be created/adapted and that the Swiss model could be a good idea in that sense.

But who knows, maybe the nation state will be completely abolished very quickly. I mean we are truly at that stage already, on an individual level any individual can in theory live stateless.

Everybody will be right. In the end, the medium is the message. We just have to build, to collaborate, in anything. Regardless of what it is. It's going to be fine. :)


Sadly most people are Statists.   Either to punish the other side or in fear of what the other side will do to them.

The result is the same; an inexorable downward spiral for all.


Grr.. Grrr. Go for a run.


Tell us who is really in charge of this electoral circus. How much power does the state really have and how is this power spread among Islamic globalists, communists and Fabian socialists? Who is who really? Without filters?


Ok, for a walk. 😎


:ThugAmy:


bolshevism is a disease


lol. 🤦♂


Yes, I agree 100%. I think it’s a similar dynamic with Trump voters in this election.

He’s promising to do away with 75% of the Federal bureaucracy - the people who make arbitrary rules that hinder business development and stifle personal freedoms - which I think many of the people on this app like the idea of.

Those types of voters seem less like statists and more like people who simply want less unelected bureaucrats ruling over them.

My point was that I don’t think people are being statists by default if they support a particular candidate. I think they’re just doing what they can within the system to help enact the change they want to see beyond the system. In my mind, this is like your running Block while funding all sorts of incredible open-source projects.


Is it rude to ask?


statists vote


this election is revealing all the statists


I read this as ‘statistics’ and didn’t disagree.

Either way, loads of dead people in the Middle East. That’s a pretty big statistic now…


especially statists who are not allowed to vote


Any system which only permits you to choose between evils is itself evil.

I think democratic systems should have mandatory voting for eligible voters, but it be required that "None Of The Above" be listed as an option on every ballot and if that option has the majority or plurality of votes then another election with other candidates be held. There should also be easy access for recalls and referenda on the ballot.


jacks comment section is so weird.


Is there a difference between recognizing some legitimate state authority and wanting more law over you?


You meant selection right Jack?


All the jew lovers


Onward 🫡


The masks of moderation are shed, and the true faces of power are revealed…


Elections are distractions. The problem is that the markets are always correlated to elections. We need to start separating property, money and influence from the state.


Everything centralized gets targeted by secret agencies?


Switzerland is also a failed state. Those who control the money and the media will always control the state.

The state is never a source of truth. But a source of propaganda for certain interests.

It can not be any other way.

Does that mean we should give up states? No. It's always better to know the devil.

Future problems will be so different from what people in this very moment assume to be the fight or struggle against authority anyways.  The state and the Fed are already rendered irrelevant.


I wouldn't about deplatforming any president. What was really bad was the censoring of so much valuable information about the "pandemic" that could have saved people's lives.

It went even so far to delete posts about Vitamin D,  Quercetin, the immune system, ... and lots more.

Why was this done nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyfehcpn?