nostr:npub1yj5xannuqk0s0hz6c53mgqc4mrxpcr0rssyn4ku2ckrmtxyhjk8qwvutt3 Yes! That's what I thought when I asked the question. I still feel like "must have" is an improvement, but I think Warren's intent was similar to what you meant in the second case, like a hypothetical scenario. The former case could be interpreted as deductive reasoning.

https://iv.nboeck.de/watch?v=zOM9GV_7MpU&t=3594