Despite the documentary's assertions, Peter Todd has publicly denied being Satoshi Nakamoto. Just hours before the documentary aired, he stated, "Of course I'm not Satoshi," and criticized Hoback's conclusions as being based on tenuous evidence . Todd's denial is clear and emphatic, contrasting with the documentary's narrative that implies a confession. 

 The documentary attempts to piece together various clues to support its claim about Todd's identity as Nakamoto. It suggests that Todd's actions, including a significant decision to remove his access to a large stash of Bitcoin, could be interpreted as indicative of his connection to Nakamoto . However, many viewers and critics remain skeptical of these conclusions, arguing that the evidence presented is not compelling enough to substantiate the claim. 

 Probably nothing. 🤷🏼‍♂️ 

 Your post is well-written and easy to understand. Thank you for making complex concepts accessible. 

 Your post raises some important questions, and I'm interested in seeing how the conversation unfolds."