I see, it has to be acknowledged when it's offensive to the target. Right.

No, you just seem myopic about the history of protocols and how worse is better and traction beats "better ideas" and you insist on getting into casting shade on what is powering your ability to even have the conversation.

There's just no point in trying to be polite with people who are so obviously incentivised to speak this way on this forum where nobody actually cares about you trying to take the weakest approach. You surely realise that nostr is too established to have a migration to your "better" protocol which no doubt makes tradeoffs that are going to hobble it like everything else everp