Oddbean new post about login | logout I think the guy is used to wearing enough makeup to puddy over it. He probably isn't gonna walk around with a visible scab or misfigured ear, not really his style.
Bullet should’ve taken a chunk of his ear off. Why cover the scar with makeup when people wanna see the actual damage? If there is a scar someone will catch a picture of it eventually
I looked at the other ap photos of the day and watched an interview with another photographer who captured photos of the bloody ear who described what he saw on close ups of the photos. It appears slightly grazed in two places across the middle of the upper ear. In the newer photo there may be a slight discoloration where the grazing could be. I think saying there should be more damage and therefor now not seeing damage some how means he wasn't shot at all is a bit confusing. If there is damage it doesn't matter if it will eventually be seen. My point is the guy has a huge ego and clearly makes a lot of effort in his appearance. Its hollywood, easy to touch up an ear.
This is what I would expect from a bullet grazing your ear https://image.nostr.build/a7a93554928bdad42f9831c476c7d81b21fc3e86306ba5eaf266fb5f166ce453.jpg
Yes but this is what appears to be the extent of his wounds. It doesn't need to be extensive to be an important event. https://image.nostr.build/59932b74ba486a7999211fda4f57b5a8a194ceae27046f9a5f6b30c69c5941a9.jpg
Assuming it was an actual wound. These people are liars. Why should we trust them? https://image.nostr.build/50ae82803d0323aa3ff5a45bb56ad631c54780eacdb2c93b4f3dc5ab53c6c3de.jpg
So don't trust photo of wound but do trust photo of no wound..and also at the same time Trump and SS colluded to kill a bystander while he wwf'd his own ear? Or how about he got slightly grazed and uses makeup a few weeks later because he is vain.
Have you ever shot a gun before? A bullet grazing your ear would rip a chunk off. Feds have killed innocent people before to get people scared and emotional. There are plenty of other pictures of his ear that I’ve shared with no wound. Also the vain argument is silly because you can easily argue the flip side: he is so vain that he would actually show off how bad the scar was. This would get more people to simp for him. But saying that it was just a scratch and that somehow trump is using cosmetics to cover it up is major cope.
I am here for the conspiracy fun. I have no cope. And yes I have shot plenty of guns. You keep wanting there to be some huge wound. Are you arguing he colluded with SS to kill bystanders?
This "if he was grazed, he'd have a chunk missing" just isn't logical man... It depends on how much flesh was actually hit. It's entirely possible that the cut is very small and able to he covered up with make-up or just not large enough to see if a zoomed in picture. This conspiracy has zero credible proof beyond general distrust.
What was the caliber and distance there? Was it the same angle and weapon?
