One of the reasons I appreciate Rothbard so much is that he acknowledges the influence that religion (specifically, eschatology) has on political views. 

So many of these disagreements come down to eschatological views; and differences in eschatological views ultimately resolve into differences of understanding regarding the creation mandates and/or in relation to the Covenant of Works (i.e., Covenant Theology). Am I incorrect that Bahnsen was a mon-ocovenantalist?

Here's another helpful article from the brilliant Brandon Adams (a fellow 1698'er): "[Theonomy?](https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2020/09/18/theonomy/)" that may also be of interest.

Cheers.