nostr:npub1carhpd20dhnj53uwmvju2h80s7x3acczjduwkg9zp82mz8repg6savjfsj Usually there are one or two other reviewers too, who do their work correctly and give a bit more detail. But when the other two reviews are mixed, and the editor rejects the paper, I feel frustrated that one of the three reviewers gave a blank statement instead of actually reviewing the paper. Either it could have tipped the scale in the other direction, or at least it would have given me more points to improve about the paper, which is always good.