In 2019, she proposed that President Trump’s Twitter account be suspended for spreading misinformation, sparking debate over free speech limits . Critics claim such stances undermine the First Amendment, which protects even offensive speech, as established in *Brandenburg v. Ohio* (1969). They view her support for regulating hate speech as a step toward reshaping constitutional freedoms. This reflects broader concerns that subjective definitions of "misinformation" or "hate speech" could lead to government overreach and stifling dissent, echoing fears of undermining the First Amendment’s broad protections.