I strongly agree. The only argument that I can think of from nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m side is he might see any change on the base chain protocol is an danger ro the stability of it. So he might think it shouldn’t be “upgraded”. Do whatever you fancy on layer 2 but leave base-chain as it is. Which is not something I hear debated enough. There is this talk about ordinals and it’s related to this difference in approach. So I can understand if he thinks like this he probably don’t see the point supporting to the biggest threat he can think of.

But just to contradict myself I can also see the point where this people actually do their best to keep the network protect against some vulnerabilities it might already possess. Maybe what opensats should do (I think nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc  is the perfect asset for this) better communicate why BitcoinDevs are important and should be supported. Probably nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx and nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy already discussed this but I may be ignorant. 

Maybe nostr:npub14mcddvsjsflnhgw7vxykz0ndfqj0rq04v7cjq5nnc95ftld0pv3shcfrlx can suggest some good discussions about this.