Who to believe? Person A: - tells ppl to mortgage house to buy BTC at top - says they will fund bitcoin dev then doesn't - thinks Bitcoin needs regulatory clarity - posts retarded AI art all day - thinks medium of exchange isn't important - uses a custodian - doesn't run a node - has a blue check Person B: - tells ppl to stay humble and stack sats - builds organizations to advance Bitcoin - posts good morning notes - supports btcpayserver - holds keys - runs node - does not have a Twitter account
Which one is called Dan?
He mislabled option D as a ₿
If you add pumps your fiat bags to A. A lot of people would choose A. Some people only care about the $ value of their BTC and it shows. https://i.nostr.build/J6KZP.gif
"Posts retarded AI art all day" had me 😂😂😂
I disagree with saylor, but will defend his right to post retarted AI photos. I actually liked them. 🤣
I’m hoping this event triggers a discussion on the deeper issues here.
Even if we have concerns about Bitcoin core, which I have as well... there is still an entire ecosystem, nostr included, that need funding too
Don’t forget all the privacy guides
Those don't make it past the govt. controlled social media algos.
I don't trust neither of them. But since it's only one side saying something without produce any proof, and the other one still silent it's a nothingburger at this point. Odell's reputation alone is nowhere near enough to make me excited, I guess.
Woah. Why the cope? Seems the sentiment is bad. Might load up on more $MSTR. Saylor did more for Bitcoin than some no name odel guy will ever do.
Lmfao
Person B. Person A is a brainwashed individual who falls for Babylonian money magick tricks, and also stacks stocks instead of sats.