nostr:npub14wm95mv2m7r53w8qjtzvnsupdpxgt59zuzza5gj9p6levkjd48ts9fnnx9 my understanding is that the plaintiffs got the court to take action ex parte making use of tools only available under trademark. So whether or not they have a copyright claim, they abused the court by asking for extraordinary action that is only available for claims they don't actually have, nor it would appear did they have a good faith basis to believe they had them. nostr:npub1ulmk7rglm7y8cykt7h40zhwnhv9c37qxq5tnna3jqz4wjx52wd8q2whweg