nostr:npub15n6ngv26udksmpwz2errzpe7z50kz7mxt0x2kdxpr3znuu6gmyzs5vdk6s From the video (and looking into some of the specs I can find online) it seems like the "backup plane" B-32 was comparable capable with far less risk and cost. Is there documentation about why they didn't ramp up production of that bomber and ramp down production of the B-29? Sunk cost fallacy?