nostr:npub1mr92cjapdpqkted8ppxwlnwlxg27t6eq2v564usutcw497q8plaqfn3xh4 nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub1x5c3ey0ehsnd62m4r7a32gnrt8re792fxx7sfa73rv7lm673wuhq84m07a nostr:npub1jjurz697s4ghw8mwy5ct2rra8lupsjarc28hz8t8wpd9j9r86m3qc3533h nostr:npub1xxtl2lpsp3gshd8p7r4sjmmltwytran3xkhz8kwdq86s6jzcvvvqkjkmmv no shit the government is evil, i'm just making the point that this isn't some way they're going to censor loli or something, they're very specifically going after photorealistic AI generated CP. which is fair, considering the ethics of generating that are extremely dubious at best.

nichegamer here has blown a gasket over something that doesn't concern lolicons at all, and i'm willing to bet a good amount of people are just looking at the headline and assuming the worst. or perhaps even reading the article and not fully grasping or not reading the legal stuff, so they just look at what nichegamer is saying which is that it will be targeting AI ART and not just realistic AI CP, because there are real children involved in the making of it. it's bad journalism, and it rubs me the wrong way because it makes it seem like lolicons are all coming to the defense of AI CP.

the tweet, alongside using a loli character as a clickbait image (and gura of all characters, who isn't just some manga character but someone with an actual real-life person behind her), insinuates that they want to ban AI art of lolis, but that's just not the case at all. they're going after something that actually has real-life implications. it feels grimy to me.