Yep, thanks for presenting a good argument.  That's the only way we can make bitcoin the best it can be.  More civil on nostr than on X!  I'm generally strongly against spamming the blockchain, especially with assinine inscriptions  I view OP_RETURNs as a more nuanced thing.  I was orginally against OP_RETURN when everyone else was for them, until they justify a use case.  Names on bitcoin might be that use case.  I can see utility in my applications, let's say I want to eliminate spammers and give users their preferred name, an OP_RETURN can give a (nostr) user proof of existence, and some skin in the game.  I remain open to facts and logic.  Thanks!