Where can you see these stats? I think you completely mog me with those numbers.
nostr.band
Thanks π
π«‘ ma pleasure
You would have 788, Ser Sleepy.
788 ?
Score. 16551 zaps : 21 median zap That means a lot of people appreciated your stuff very often.
ohh I never seen that 788 score before whereβd you see that
OHHHH lol You divided total zaps by median zap amount
I was so lost https://media1.tenor.com/m/w2pqHCw_RJ0AAAAC/confused-confused-math.gif
Whatβs the headache? Thatβs they are wrong or they canβt disprove the fact?
Flawed standard models go deep ποΈ
The numbers don't say anything on their own. Only in relationship to each other. You'd need some sort of ratio, like number of zaps : median zap Then I would have a score of 58 and you would have one of 4 because most of your sats came from one zap. Noshole would have 28 and Gigi would have 868. If my math is correct. π
Unfortunately, zap receipts can be spoofed so they're probably not good to use for wot. The only one that knows for sure if a zap was real, is the recipient that manages the wallet that received the zap. "This isn't really a payment proof, there is no real way to prove that the invoice is real or has been paid. You are trusting the author of the zap receipt for the legitimacy of the payment." From https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/57.md
It's the same with followers in WoT. People make multiple npubs and then they can recommend each other.
True, yeah I always felt like these are both somewhat non starters.. the only things that seemed like they would work would be more like fiatjaf's pyramid, or that notabot project, where people vouch for each other, and when bots are discovered you know the invite tree (how they got in) and can prune it.
you can do that with WoT as well, because it's always one dumbass in your list that is at the root of it, cut them out, and their immediate neighbours and voila, clean again this is why i rage against wishy washy "tolerant" people
Yeah but following someone isn't the same as vouching for them