nostr:npub1ak5kewf6anwkrt0qc8ua907ljkn7wm83e2ycyrpcumjvaf2upszs8r0gwg nostr:npub1kt362ldewechajwgjr9xggq52a68nt54chj7wgvj5z309lr3rg8shapgcv Why do you get the idea that theonomists want a church wielding the sword? Ever one I've seen has an understanding of sphere sovereignty as explained by Kuyper. I'd be interested in who you've heard the opposite from.

I hold to the 1689. "The church and the civil powers are distinct governments with different powers, means, methods, and ends". Can you find me a theonomist/reconstructionist that denies this?