Nice argument. Except for the HUGE holes in logic. 

When you sell something you do so using the infrastructure set up by you country and that infrastructure needs funding for developing, maintaining and improving. Even the very laws and law enforcement are infrastructure. 

Also the people that need infrastructure the most are the ones with the less resources to pay for it. In your proposition, people living in huge cities would say "why would I pay for the roads of the rest of the country, while the rest of the country can't afford to pay for the roads because the lack of roads means less business

You are acting like the government doesn't give you anything because millions of people already paid for your stuff. 

The us struggles to get people to vote, and voting is free. Imagine trying to get them to give money to paid for someone else's infrastructure