Like I said, I’m happy to help out and judge. But I still would want to see a formalized approach to this. Put something together, publish it in the open and get feedback. 

If you’re going to have judges then you might want to come up with a “scorecard” for them to fill out. The other idea I thought of which could be cool is having people submit anonymously and then your Nostr Memes account just posts all of the memes for people to see and react to. 

I’m honestly ok with keeping one of the criteria “likes/zaps” because then it takes into account what the overall community thinks as well besides just individual judges.  

 I had done that before the only issue with that was people reposting their own memes 😅😂 

& I’ll see what I can come up with! I’ll keep you posted 🫡 

 they also had watermarks or distinguishable elements in the meme that outed them lol 

 Well that’s not as important as moving away from using only reactions to choose winners imo  

 I mean that idea relies on reactions you said it yourself, I was just explaining why it’s not really anon

n agree we shouldn’t do that idea for those two reasons 

 No what I said was to have a panel of judges, but one of the judging criteria (out if many) is what the community thinks based on likes/zaps/comments, etc. I don’t think you should get rid of community preference altogether. I just don’t think you should solely rely on reactions to judge this thing.