that was for radiation therapy, not diagnostic radiography. I have been careful to only talk about diagnostic imaging. Also, that unfortunate event is from almost 40 years ago.
Yes, I have heard about it MANY times in the countless radiation safety courses that have interupted my clinical time. This is my point
Good cameras don't need redundantly safe over-engineered preventative measures against emitting harmful radiation. Today is not the day to find out why yours have so many
ok, to be clear we are talking about radiographs. not cameras
Same thing
they are simiilar but no, that is incorrect. they are not the same. cameras are for photographs. Radiographs aren't the same. you are reaching here if you think they are. I have never once heard of a medical radiography device be referred to as a camera.
there is an important distinction between a visible light source that a camera uses and the ionising radiation made by an x-ray tube
The first camera made heliographs
The important distinction is that your camera can make a cell rebellious ser
what are you talking about. why do you keep changing the topic. we were talking about medical radiographs
Your medical radiograph can cause cancer
Oddbean new post about login | logout