https://m.primal.net/JWgs.png

woo, on-chain zaps and antizaps working on testnet.

https://mempool.space/testnet4/tx/6d8d2c26fb6f68097c7bbca6843d3ef475368d6211c837632446bc4a0f3f162a

Draft NIP 570

https://gist.github.com/melvincarvalho/15f767fee8ed3e14197b322235e9fe8d


👀👀
nostr:nevent1qqsx7pdayygap2ltl5x2dj0470cervxj5xp98zp2msusrx7mv78g4mgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsdulkdrc5hdf4dktl6taxmsxnasykghdnf32sqmnc7w6km2hhav3grqsqqqqqpxq09z8


lmao on-chain zaps? why not i guess? 😉


on-chain zaps for when your zap is phat and you don't care about instant gratification.

nostr:note1duzm6gg36z47hlgv5myltul3jxcd9gvz2wyz4hpeqxdakeuw3tks88f928


Anti zaps?


Wondering the same


awesome!


you can do this without putting anything onchain by using silent payments and an encrypted note on nostr that lets the recipient know what output is being spent. much nicer for utxo privacy.


please no


Wouldn't it be better to just transfer the BTC to a UTXO the nsec can unlock?


That's exactly what it does.  The npub and taproot addresses are the same key.


Example:

https://nostrapps.github.io/taproot/


ohhh I missed that! Nice! Let's go!


I'll add a sentence in the NIP to make it clearer.  Thanks for the feedback!


Added: "Note: that taproot address and npub are interchangable addresses with a different prefix. Sats are transferred to a UTXO the nsec can unlock."


Address reuse as a feature?


Looks like we're both thinking about this stuff at the same time. You may want to consider avoiding address reuse in NIP-570 like in my suggestions 🤙

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqamkcvk5k8g730e2j6atadp6mxk7z4aaxc7cnwrlkclx79z4tzygqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3xamnwvaz7tm0venxx6rpd9hzuur4vghsqgqqqqpuqdkz6ywxwevs50xgu6mte0kmnz73sl2f7yn506tjexdssv97da4m

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqamkcvk5k8g730e2j6atadp6mxk7z4aaxc7cnwrlkclx79z4tzygqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3xamnwvaz7tm0venxx6rpd9hzuur4vghsqgqqqqpwh8000p75krkj37hnvgft54vaxj42w5kchedpqhzr99qy85r8vwd0


Wait, does this NIP-570 already avoid address reuse? I may have misunderstood at first


We may have misunderstood the premise


Funny how we all seem to be struggling to understand what we're reading.

Maybe the anti zaps can just take back tips that haven't yet been transferred again?


Opposite of a zap.  A zap is an upvote with a payment (to the user).  And antizap is a downvote with a payment.

Has been covered before.  Someone made notes here.

https://github.com/cromatikap/nostr-reputation-authority


Thank you for continuing your work, and assistance


https://m.primal.net/JWnB.png

yw, here's a couple of refrences (which I've now added to the gist).  Thanks for the feedback!

https://nostr.at/nevent1qqsr5yln0f96nmnnnu8lr09pvrdt7mrayu4537q6mhfahlcu3k0qxfgzyr08ang799m2dtdjl7jlfkup5lvp9j9mv6v25qxu78nk4k64alty24m3gjw

and

https://github.com/cromatikap/nostr-reputation-authority/issues/1


ついに on-chain zap が爆誕

nostr:nevent1qqsx7pdayygap2ltl5x2dj0470cervxj5xp98zp2msusrx7mv78g4mgpzpmhxue69uhk2tnwdaejumr0dshsygx70mx3u2tk56km9la97ndcrf7cztytke5c4gqdeu08dtd4tm7kg5psgqqqqqqsynytky

nostr:nprofile1qqsz6kmyqn04xt0qstv7wlmlgft6daplk7dmnh5d6wk8ma0x6j6spvqpzdmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ue0qydhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnhv4ehgetjde38gcewvdhk6tcpz9mhxue69uhnzdps9enrw73wd9hj7y8s04w


Why would someone pay for dislikes?

I hate what you posted

Here take some money

🤷🏻♂


Payment must be burnt, go to something neutral, or to the community.


Like a neighborhood watch? Cost to make sure drunk uncle albert doesn’t get into the stores