Oddbean new post about | logout
โ–ฒ โ–ผ
 Sorry guys Iโ€™ve been out with the family today so trying to get caught up. @๐•พ๐–Š๐–— ๐•พ๐–‘๐–Š๐–Š๐–•๐–ž youโ€™re amazing coordinating these and pushing this forward, and being open discussion on ways to make it even better. Doc and I have discussed some ideas and one weโ€™ve talked about that I particularly like is is a tournament-style approach. Nothing too complicated so itโ€™s still fun, and I think it can help make things more fair and also provide judges each week. Basically hereโ€™s the idea: 

- Each tournament could be 5 weeks at a time. 4 weeks of qualifying rounds, and then the 5th week would be the final. 

- Have a consistent sponsored prize purse for the first 4 weeks, and a larger sponsored prize purse for the final.

- Each person can only win once during the duration of the weekly qualifying matches.

- The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place winners each week would then be expected to serve as judges for the following week, along with the sponsor and you or someone else if you want to participate. 5 total judges each week. Simple majority vote of judges wins. 

- After the weekly qualifying matches conclude, hold a final. Only the winners from that round of qualifying matches are eligible to enter the final. 

- The panel of judges for the final could be formed of other contestants or special invited guest judges.  
โ–ฒ โ–ผ
 I like this idea a lot. Solves your problem of not having judges and can incorporate a lot of the stuff we discussed with regards to judging criteria.  
โ–ฒ โ–ผ
 I put our conversation in ChatGPT and this is what it spit out:

Based on your conversation and the input from Doc, Sleepy, and others, here's a potential framework for your meme competition that addresses the challenges you've identified, like the issue of fairness, voting methods, and the selection of judges.

### **1. Judging Panel Structure**
- **Rotating Judges**: As suggested, the winners from each week (1st, 2nd, and 3rd place) can act as judges for the following week. This allows for more community involvement and keeps fresh perspectives in the judging panel.
- **Sponsor or Special Guest Judges**: Each week, include the sponsor or a guest judge from the community, such as a prominent figure (Doc, Corndalorian, etc.). This will keep the judging panel dynamic and connected to the broader community.
- **5 Judges Each Week**: The weekly judging panel should consist of 5 members (3 winners from the previous week + 2 chosen guests/sponsors), with a simple majority vote determining the winner.

### **2. Tournament-Style Format**
- **5-Week Tournament Cycle**:
  - **4 Weeks of Qualifiers**: Each week serves as a qualifying round for the final.
  - **Final in Week 5**: Only winners of the qualifying rounds can participate. A separate, larger prize for the final will make it exciting and competitive.
  - **Weekly Prize**: Have consistent, smaller prize pools for the qualifiers and a larger one for the final.
  - **No Repeat Wins in Qualifiers**: To encourage more participation and fairness, a participant can only win once in the qualifiers. However, they can still participate in the final if theyโ€™ve won a previous qualifier.

### **3. Criteria for Judging Memes**
Hereโ€™s a breakdown of specific categories that can be used for scoring memes, which could help the panel think systematically:

- **Humor/Entertainment (10 points)**: How funny or entertaining is the meme? Does it elicit laughter or a strong reaction from the audience?
  
- **Creativity/Originality (10 points)**: Is the meme unique or does it provide a fresh take on a familiar theme? Did the contestant create something new or remix an existing meme format in a clever way?

- **Relevance to Theme (10 points)**: How well does the meme align with the theme of the week (if applicable)? Does it relate to the broader conversation or topic of the contest?

- **Visual Appeal (5 points)**: Is the meme visually striking? This includes image quality, use of colors, and overall aesthetic appeal.

- **Shareability/Viral Potential (5 points)**: Would the meme perform well if shared more widely? Does it have the potential to go viral?

- **Cultural Awareness (5 points)**: Does the meme avoid being offensive while still being playful or edgy?

Total possible score: **45 points**  
The panel can score each meme on these criteria, and the highest-scoring meme wins. If thereโ€™s a tie, the panel can vote again, or a tiebreaker criterion (such as most zaps or reactions) could be used.

### **4. Community Involvement (Zaps/Reactions)**
Instead of solely relying on zaps and reactions (which can be spoofed or influenced by large accounts), community voting can be incorporated as a **weighted factor**:
- **Zaps or Reactions as a Judge Vote Equivalent**: The meme with the most zaps can be given the same weight as one judgeโ€™s vote, or it can break a tie.
- **Separate Peopleโ€™s Choice Award**: Alternatively, have a separate โ€œPeopleโ€™s Choice Awardโ€ based solely on community reactions, allowing for some community input without it being the primary factor in deciding the winner.

### **5. Logistics for Running the Competition**
- **Submission Deadline**: Define when memes must be submitted each week.
- **Judging Period**: Allow judges 1โ€“2 days to review and score memes.
- **Results Announcement**: Announce winners at the end of each week and reveal who the judges will be for the next round.
  
### **6. Example Judging Sheet for Each Judge**

| Meme Entry   | Humor (10) | Creativity (10) | Relevance (10) | Visual Appeal (5) | Shareability (5) | Cultural Awareness (5) | Total (45) |
|--------------|------------|-----------------|----------------|-------------------|------------------|------------------------|------------|
| Meme #1      | 8          | 9               | 10             | 4                 | 4                | 5                      | 40         |
| Meme #2      | 10         | 7               | 8              | 5                 | 3                | 4                      | 37         |

### **7. Fairness & Visibility**
To address the concerns about visibility:
- **Equal Promotion**: Ensure all submissions receive equal exposure through reposts and engagement. Judges and prominent figures can help promote all entries so everyone has a fair chance of being seen.
- **Focus on Quality Over Quantity**: Reinforce that the quality and humor of the meme matter more than just how many likes or zaps it gets.

### **8. Final Tournament Structure**
- Once the weekly rounds are over, the final contest will only involve the weekly winners.
- Have a new set of judges for the final, possibly made up of prominent community members or invited guests.
  
This framework should help formalize the process while keeping it fun and inclusive, addressing both the judging fairness and the issue of uneven visibility in decentralized platforms like Nostr.

Let me know if youโ€™d like any further refinements! 
 perf the 1-2 day voting period suggestion should fix the issue of different time zones for judges 
โ–ฒ โ–ผ
 Nice work Doc! 
 Appreciate that @corndalorian thank you for taking the time! sounds great!

Iโ€™m gonna think hard about this and see how I can find sponsors for the 4 weeks as well as the big prize pool for the final (maybe some announcements will get us somewhere) and then how the logistics for everyone voting on time while being on different time zones would work (hard to hold people accountable for something like this, specially on Sundays) aside from that I can see it working 
 Just an update for you guys

I asked the community to vote on the future of #NostrMemes contests 

nostr:note1vm5na6c7k8fkgvtxvkh99nz8shnt2hvrhq0nw6d5qvjy9jzjwptqngdaah