nostr:npub1prsz93kl2wf5rdqvhk86zvyhnsney848wn6cmqxpr3skcxc8zm5q4glv40 nostr:npub1xxdjunlfj2u33un56dmsdat3zs3hp2hdcvf6a9myqmcq30u2rlaqgrhnjg 

I dont see why they couldnt adjust the study design to answer the question. Unless they arent interested in the question is my concern.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2802878

One solid study I can find on it.

But plenty of financially compromised Academics who can dismiss long covid because "temporal delays, arbitrary definitions, and causality concerns", same garbage that was said about the 1950 BMJ study correlating cancer & smoking. 

See: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/risk-of-long-covid-distorted-by-flawed-research-academics-say/ar-AA1hfuV2

To get mad.