Sorry, but I disagree.
Traditionally, art is seen as an expression of human intentionality and creativity. A human artist creates works to communicate emotions, ideas or to explore concepts. AI, in contrast, generates works by following algorithms and preset patterns. It has no consciousness, intentions or understanding of what it is creating. From this perspective, some argue that art requires the intentionality of a conscious creator and, therefore, AI-generated art would not be art in the traditional sense.
nostr:nevent1qqspy2ksuszsh08rvcrmv6dtvzsvxvy8shd8c0wrfj9u3lk8fpa7xucppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgs2e0zd0ltq3cr73xq0p0ph4qw9wmchzgz08s6gjx0lzushtczl8asrqsqqqqqp4zyjld 

 Bro the people selling the paint don’t allow us access 

 I don't understand, can you explain it to me?  

 I have no paint and art supplies are not available to us but a higher literate class that only make state art 

 A lot of intention went into this piece. Your approval is not required. 

 Your statement was also uncalled for and is also incorrect. Have a nice day. 

 You said my art isn't art, that's your opinion and I'm allowed to respond. All through time people try to define what is and isn't art. Duchamp wasn't accepted at first either.  

 I didn't say YOUR art isn't art.
I said AI art isn't art.
Digital art is art, AI art is not.