nostr:npub1hrj2028dawlu4qtmuwe9q0fg3eer6ltdxs2l4n6ys475egs88vrsg56p8k The SG was right; the NetChoice cases are bad vehicles for the Supreme Court to take up editorial transparency laws. The preliminary posture and NetChoice's litigation choices to deemphasize the issue mean that it's poorly presented here. NetChoice has the opportunity to persuade the courts that the laws are unconstitutional on a fuller record, and if it doesn't, there will be a circuit split on editorial transparency for the Supreme Court to review in due course.