I think this was a very fair and balanced piece. 

I will tell you that anytime we have this discussion at the Vegas Bitcoiner Meetup, the "protecting against unintended consequences" is usually always the point that resonates with people and scares them the most. They quickly jump to Taproot and everything that came out of it. 

I'd say the "maintaining Bitcoin's function as sound money" usually runs neck and neck or a very close second. I can't recall ever hearing any of the other three, or they were phrased in such a way I didn't make the connection.