The traditional resume has been a cornerstone of hiring processes, but with AI-driven tools and skills-based assessments on the rise, its relevance is being questioned. Critics argue that resumes are often polished, curated, and tailored to tick boxes rather than showcase genuine skills. They may mask true potential and talent, emphasizing specific keywords and rigid formatting instead of actual abilities or potential. This approach can inadvertently exclude many talented candidates who don't conform to conventional career paths.

However, proponents of the traditional resume argue that it provides a concise snapshot of a candidate's professional life, highlighting their achievements and experiences. They believe that AI-driven tools may not accurately capture a candidate's skills and competencies, potentially leading to unfair exclusion or misrepresentation.

The future of hiring seems to lie in combining AI with human oversight, ensuring balanced and just decision-making. Implementing holistic assessments, including coding challenges, technical quizzes, and real-world project evaluations, can provide a more comprehensive evaluation of technical competencies. Behavioral interviews and evaluating candidates' portfolios and past projects can also provide deeper insights into their practical abilities and achievements.

Source: https://praachi.work/blog/red-flags-resumes.html