### Summary
The debate around deletion and editing features in decentralized networks like Nostr revolves around balancing technical feasibility with social intentions, focusing on empowering users to retract or revise content rather than ensuring complete removal.

### Facts
- 📝 Some believe deletion and editing are essential for more honest social media, while others argue against it.
- 🌐 Decentralized protocols like Nostr cannot guarantee permanent deletion due to technical limitations.
- 🖥️ Computers often keep copies, making it hard to completely delete content.
- 💬 Deletion and editing mimic real-life social interactions and signal learning or regret.
- 🛠️ These tools help users express intent, signaling mistakes or feedback, despite technical restrictions.
- 🔄 Nostr supports delete and expiring notes, although not all relays honor deletions.
- ✏️ Edit allows creators to update content or correct errors, enhancing freedom in content control.
- 💡 Deletion and editing empower users to manage their online media, fostering a more humane internet experience.
Summarized by https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/cbgecfllfhmmnknmamkejadjmnmpfjmp