I think we might have misunderstood each other, and I jumped to conclusions. I apologize, and quickly forgive your comments after my rebuke, knowing they came from a place of hurt that I caused. The end goal on everyone's mind is to secure their funds to the best of their ability with the information they have and the resources provided to them. 

If there was objective consensus on which device was the most reliable and secure, then I suspect we'd all be on the same page. The problem we run into is that we have a wide variety of hardware wallets available, and seemingly all of them have significant issues, Trezor included:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyQo95wfSaI

The universal consensus, or "statement of faith" if you will in bitcoin is "Don't Trust, Verify". Unfortunately, Nostr recommendations are often given as marketing propaganda, not because the user themselves have truly verified for themselves. I would venture to guess that most people on here might have the computer science background to semi understand the code if provided open source, however, not many people would be able to identify a back door if they saw it. There are for profit companies behind these resources that are just one government request away from building a backdoor. 

So yes, I agree that my setup isn't the utopian gold standard that we wish existed, but it's the best I've managed to verify within my limited understanding of the hardware/software, and is resistant to necessary software updates.