I’m all for debate. Without it, there is no growth. Unfortunately, sometimes you’re not heard unless you’re a bit bombastic.

Morally, I don’t think you know either of them, but only what media tells you. Morally, you and I are no better than they are (if you argue we are, you’re appealing to a standard that is above the law). Morally, they are sinners. Morally “gross”, is a blanket label and lacks any nuance. Applying a blanket label to the character of somebody you don’t personally know is nonsensical. 

Yes, they are both competing for the same system. But the competition is not inherently bad. The “angle”, as you say, is everything. For example, one of them was literally given a nomination for the first time in our history, not voted to be a party nominee. 

The system they are contending for has made all of our lives more challenging. Does the nature of the current system inform how we should chose for change? Absolutely. Is it helpful to assign the same arbitrary and malignant adjective to describe two candidates that could not be more in juxtaposition politically? Absolutely not.