Oddbean new post about | logout
 @๐“ž๐“ท๐”‚๐”.๐“ฅ๐“ฒ๐”๐“ฎ๐“ท 
 our ride or die 

#booba resident ๐Ÿซ‚๐Ÿ’œ 
 wtf I shouldโ€™ve not used that hashtag 
 Is this your way of telling us youโ€™ve added it to your hashtag watchlist? ๐Ÿ‘€ 
 Weird, i thought you tagged one of my uncensored boob posts with that tag last week , and itโ€™s not showing up under that tag anymore. 
 Honestly tho wtf did that one go?! lol 
 Oh shit I just saw this and yeah I def tagged it before but itโ€™s not there 
 I know you did. I know itโ€™s not. 
 One of my notes from last week never appeared on Primal and I still canโ€™t figure it out.
nostr:note18a0y77xhk7lw0cge0qlyjcyg59n0gjmvhxt3az8w97uhwztgh9fsyqsru9 
 Bizarre. 

I know I had complaints / jokes about possibly breaking one of the clients temporarily when I posted. I also know a lot donโ€™t appreciate or want my content on their relay or on nostr in general. ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿฅฒ 

But yours sir , makes no sense as to why yours didnโ€™t go through. ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ’ญ 
 Weโ€™re being censored. I knew it ๐Ÿค“๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ˜… 
 Probably ๐Ÿคฃ nothing new ๐Ÿฅฒ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ™ƒ 
โ–ฒ โ–ผ
 those darn nips & bips!      ffs 
 @primal is showing a different note

And @damus shows a different one too https://i.nostr.build/HrNVvrQwD95ePKTT.png  
 @elsat @jb55 I didnโ€™t know notes could be different between clients 
 This is due to how Damus/Primal handles NIP-10 and nostr:reference
The Daniel's note in question has 3 different mentions/references

** Embedded note that Daniel wanted to mention (this uses nostr: format)

nostr:nevent1qqsr7hj00rtm00h8uyvhs0jfvzy2zeh5fdktn9c73rhzlwthp95tj5cpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyrhxagf6h8l9cjngatumrg60uq22v66qz979pm32v985ek54ndh8gqcyqqqqqqgd2l60l

**Onyx's note to which The Daniel replied 
(This is in NIP-10 format with "reply" marker)

nostr:nevent1qqs94afkfchld4zc9hkaenttdwnaaf8z6qvywnqu28879seds49xqjcmntm6u

** The Daniel's original note "Never forget..." to which Onyx replied (This is in NIP-10 format with "root" marker)

nostr:nevent1qqswgsj7s2vfkhkj8ejhy4tzc633cj3fvmf8f3zy2hlqx3z6ulpuy4gpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyrhxagf6h8l9cjngatumrg60uq22v66qz979pm32v985ek54ndh8gqcyqqqqqqgvzxrmj

I am not sure why the nostr: embedded reference was ignored by Damus & "root" note is shown instead. 
Maybe it's because the quote format is different in Damus -- it's uses a "q" tag instead of "e" tag ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 I am not even sure what you're seeing in this post of mine as I am adding Amethyst too to the mix now ๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿ˜… 
โ–ฒ โ–ผ
 Thank you @เฎšเฎพเฎฐเฏ-็ง‹้™ฝ

Yeah NIP-10 is a bit janky, and the devs dont have a test suite as of today. Hence why results differ.

Bookmarked for #nostrability analysis. 
โ–ฒ โ–ผ
 I think we have a bug, I experienced this recently as well. 
โ–ฒ โ–ผ
 It displays correctly on Damus but Primal is not showing the right quoted note, and the one that should be there canโ€™t be found at all with Primal. 
 Phew I fixed it.
Letโ€™s see how long it lasts. ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿซฃ๐Ÿง 
 That was super strange! Letโ€™s seee!! 
 #booba #boobstr 

Repost because someone must have deleted it how rude. ๐Ÿ™ƒ https://v.nostr.build/LSDuu8hgSdIHn2ZN.mp4