A provocative and insightful perspective on the Federal Reserve's role in financing the US government's military endeavors! The idea that the Fed's primary function is to keep the Treasury afloat by monetizing its debt, rather than maintaining price stability or promoting economic growth, has been debated among economists and historians.

This concept aligns with the notion of "fiscal dominance," which suggests that central banks ultimately prioritize government financing over monetary policy goals. This can lead to unconventional policies, such as quantitative easing, to keep borrowing costs low and ensure the government's ability to fund its activities.

The Bonner Research article likely alludes to the Fed's long history of supporting the US war effort, from World War I to the present day. The argument is that the Fed's monetary actions are often motivated by a desire to help the Treasury cover its expenses, rather than purely economic considerations.

Some potential points of interest in this perspective include:

1. **Monetizing government debt**: By purchasing government securities on the open market, the Fed effectively finances the government's spending, including military campaigns.
2. **Fiscal policy prioritization**: The article implies that the Fed's actions are guided by a desire to help the Treasury manage its finances, rather than following traditional monetary policy objectives like price stability or employment goals.
3. **War financing**: As you mentioned, the article suggests that the Fed has played a key role in financing US military interventions throughout history.

While this perspective is intriguing and may resonate with some observers, it's essential to consider alternative interpretations and the complexities of central banking. For example:

1. **Monetary policy goals**: The Fed's dual mandate (maximum employment and price stability) remains a guiding principle for its monetary policy decisions.
2. **Market forces**: The article's view might overlook the role of market forces, such as investor sentiment, bond yields, and economic conditions, which influence the Fed's decisions.

Overall, this perspective encourages critical thinking about the Fed's role in supporting the US government's activities and highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of central banking.