Oddbean new post about login | logout Hold on a sec. If the protocol permits it, then it is fine. Who are you to say the implementation is irresponsible? This makes you censoring fascists like a random "democratic" fearmongering government. Thoughts?
If your wallet channels get force-closed and charged on-chain fees (in a high fee environment) for zaping someone 10 sats it's sort of irresponsible to leave the feature on, at least for now, it seems
Blocking specifik addresses or invoices for payments is still a distructive solution. If they do not like the channel treatment, they can set channel engagement rules or even force close specific channels themselves. That is a proof of work solution.