From a European point of view (not only the European Union), talking about censorship resistance can be problematic.  I talked to some fediverse european users who requires to have filters so that not everything can be said, but also received. These are mostly people who have been at some point bullied or cyberbulllied, and want to have a safe place. #Nostr should also address these kind of regulated areas.

I agree, another angle should be used, because unique feature are note what the public is looking for, only very specific users. The public dislike changes, that's why #bluesky has more traction : it looks like something they already know, and can use right away.

Mastodon was not so obvious to use for beginners, because of the decentraisation. This unique feature completely lose them. I'm not surprised .social server is the largest server. Maybe in the near future the decentralised identity project will help.

So why one should use bluesky over nostr as a mivroblogging service? What are the day to day advantages from UI and UX perspective from one over the other.

And as CARLOS mentionned, there is no one CEO or major personnality to push Nostr forward.

(this is the same problem linux distros had until Redhat and Ubuntu came out with a company behind)