Oddbean

Really curious about this, how would you setup this to be UX friendly? Where are the user controlled keys are going to reside? I suppose there will need to be a user controlled active signer somewhere no?

The proces on https://join.the-nostr.org/ (just a demo, do not use it) is rather smooth, only that this does not explicitly give you the underlying privatekey, but it is actually stored locally so trivial to add. You 'need' an active signer only if you want to be part of the multisig. Not sure how usefull that actually is, you only reduce the trust a tiny bit. Its still a threshold signature so collution is still possible so at the end of the day you still trust those that you made part of the FROST. So no, you dont need to be an active signer, you just get a bunker link and you are off. If the link gets compromised you can ask the signers to stop signing and create a new FROST based on the same key with the same resulting Npub

so let me get this straight, you hire more nsecbunkers instead of just one? I am not going to pass judgment on that I promise I just want to know what is, and will keep mu opinions to myself this time.

Don't you need multiple service providers to hold your keys and sign on your behalf, basically multiple signers, these are services. I can't imagine the UX of asking normal people like myself to sign up to multiple providers and judge who deserves my trust and who don't

Meh. You can just trust an aggrigator directly like on that demo-site, or a nice market place where you select your providers, pay and move on with your day should do it. Judging whom to trust is a problem in so many places/things yet the world still functions.

Me is the wrong attitude if your mission is to make public keys usable for most people. But I don't think I can offer much better alternatives given that key delegation was already rejected in Nostr before. Diversity of experiments are good as well.